From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755683AbaC0KzF (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Mar 2014 06:55:05 -0400 Received: from mezzanine.sirena.org.uk ([106.187.55.193]:33723 "EHLO mezzanine.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752785AbaC0KzD (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Mar 2014 06:55:03 -0400 Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 10:54:36 +0000 From: Mark Brown To: Nicolin Chen Cc: Xiubo Li-B47053 , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" , "alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" Message-ID: <20140327105436.GF30768@sirena.org.uk> References: <1395834517-16426-1-git-send-email-Guangyu.Chen@freescale.com> <11a8271c31044515bd2657a93aefdaec@BY2PR03MB505.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <20140327023617.GB16197@MrMyself> <1e2d210764724c7e834c5307b54c37ab@BY2PR03MB505.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <20140327025647.GC16197@MrMyself> <12f887b3889a41849026965f0cf7db1f@BY2PR03MB505.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <20140327033117.GD16197@MrMyself> <62630844c7434df6937ca25d3f47b656@BY2PR03MB505.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <20140327035726.GA16359@MrMyself> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qftxBdZWiueWNAVY" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140327035726.GA16359@MrMyself> X-Cookie: You look tired. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 82.45.252.252 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: fsl_sai: Add isr to deal with error flag X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mezzanine.sirena.org.uk) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --qftxBdZWiueWNAVY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 11:57:27AM +0800, Nicolin Chen wrote: > On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 12:06:53PM +0800, Xiubo Li-B47053 wrote: > > I have checked in the Vybrid and LS1 SoC datasheets, and they are all the > > Same as above, and nothing else. > > Have I missed ? > What i.MX IC team told me is SAI ignores what we do to FWF and FRF, so you > don't need to worry about it at all unless Vybrid makes them writable, in > which case we may also need to clear these bits and confirm with Vybrid IC > team if they're also W1C. And even if it payed attention I'd expect that a lot of the time they'd just be reasserted immediately as the condition still holds. --qftxBdZWiueWNAVY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTNANpAAoJELSic+t+oim9r2cP/3dQQg6dU4Lij5ZiofJFGOjs bQorzEeQzHbKAY4Wb305d0zLJXSP7jdZ30oczgm9NjeUh1MQQKuMhwKOAVLkhVMd thCCEVltQiuFHvCFpg7FTjR6BJ+Zs0MHlCX9dRZ1Z9oukoqryqZA7bH7wu+7NKgp P/TV+edn0XKXJ1O0JT2NOQTHdbiLedZjM1YwZorWCxPZI58YZ//0bKl5gU1S5PuL huAYiuLHGMMzDF2RL+zBz+63LHbF6iuGHlQ3BdV/UTuakfijo/WEU23L94MOtydh c3Idk9CZav/mfp3aKatlcabcYgrgOA248Ghmt9TSbNXQj8A+u6E1raA35YC2Yky8 J+tZ6ywqLpCqXjGDFK1B2GNMvdlBSLV9wFUINc3QHWtd0g8jpM5K/jVX8Pxh4bWc tbnsrZ7LGAhNRmPtEOKNxOGMhaVULXE+M+BXmeG2+QUaZj6GK99BzkgpP/Oy2Kij qb1II9xbGVAb2Kv6BgRWMx+vAlIQpamsdHDJhmyGqDoRXszQt1uW3Dv3M+Iz4S+N lHZRbfwtNn6KbnaGzLL6Y8hNrEL5YkHBCzutO8Xj4JwILFXWzdCcd70OrE1CE9Tl cOfbz/mF3pznrcuOl1cikhB7Zaz6V7LDhfi+aXNxa0eM1UCo87Ny/ESxt3n3dznO +ws1n+FMe80NSiUqgDUr =mDGu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --qftxBdZWiueWNAVY--