From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
David Long <dave.long@linaro.org>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>,
Jim Keniston <jkenisto@us.ibm.com>,
Jonathan Lebon <jlebon@redhat.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 8/7] uprobes/x86: Send SIGILL if arch_uprobe_post_xol() fails
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2014 22:00:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140403200053.GD12639@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140403200015.GC12639@redhat.com>
Currently the error from arch_uprobe_post_xol() is silently ignored.
This doesn't look good and this can lead to the hard-to-debug problems.
1. Change handle_singlestep() to loudly complain and send SIGILL.
Note: this only affects x86, ppc/arm can't fail.
2. Change arch_uprobe_post_xol() to call arch_uprobe_abort_xol() and
avoid TF games if it is going to return an error.
This can help to to analyze the problem, if nothing else we should
not report ->ip = xol_slot in the core-file.
Note: this means that handle_riprel_post_xol() can be called twice,
but this is fine because it idempotent.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c | 16 ++++++++++++----
kernel/events/uprobes.c | 8 +++++++-
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c b/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
index 43df132..3bdfb6e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
@@ -594,6 +594,15 @@ int arch_uprobe_post_xol(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct pt_regs *regs)
struct uprobe_task *utask = current->utask;
WARN_ON_ONCE(current->thread.trap_nr != UPROBE_TRAP_NR);
+
+ if (auprobe->ops->post_xol) {
+ int err = auprobe->ops->post_xol(auprobe, regs);
+ if (err) {
+ arch_uprobe_abort_xol(auprobe, regs);
+ return err;
+ }
+ }
+
current->thread.trap_nr = utask->autask.saved_trap_nr;
/*
* arch_uprobe_pre_xol() doesn't save the state of TIF_BLOCKSTEP
@@ -605,8 +614,6 @@ int arch_uprobe_post_xol(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct pt_regs *regs)
else if (!(auprobe->fixups & UPROBE_FIX_SETF))
regs->flags &= ~X86_EFLAGS_TF;
- if (auprobe->ops->post_xol)
- return auprobe->ops->post_xol(auprobe, regs);
return 0;
}
@@ -641,8 +648,9 @@ int arch_uprobe_exception_notify(struct notifier_block *self, unsigned long val,
/*
* This function gets called when XOL instruction either gets trapped or
- * the thread has a fatal signal, so reset the instruction pointer to its
- * probed address.
+ * the thread has a fatal signal, or if arch_uprobe_post_xol() failed.
+ * Reset the instruction pointer to its probed address for the potential
+ * restart or for post mortem analysis.
*/
void arch_uprobe_abort_xol(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct pt_regs *regs)
{
diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
index 7a3e14e..2adbc97 100644
--- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
@@ -1858,10 +1858,11 @@ out:
static void handle_singlestep(struct uprobe_task *utask, struct pt_regs *regs)
{
struct uprobe *uprobe;
+ int err = 0;
uprobe = utask->active_uprobe;
if (utask->state == UTASK_SSTEP_ACK)
- arch_uprobe_post_xol(&uprobe->arch, regs);
+ err = arch_uprobe_post_xol(&uprobe->arch, regs);
else if (utask->state == UTASK_SSTEP_TRAPPED)
arch_uprobe_abort_xol(&uprobe->arch, regs);
else
@@ -1875,6 +1876,11 @@ static void handle_singlestep(struct uprobe_task *utask, struct pt_regs *regs)
spin_lock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock);
recalc_sigpending(); /* see uprobe_deny_signal() */
spin_unlock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock);
+
+ if (unlikely(err)) {
+ uprobe_warn(current, "execute the probed insn, sending SIGILL.");
+ force_sig_info(SIGILL, SEND_SIG_FORCED, current);
+ }
}
/*
--
1.5.5.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-03 20:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-31 19:43 [PATCH 0/7] uprobes/x86: introduce uprobe_xol_ops and arch_uprobe->ops Oleg Nesterov
2014-03-31 19:43 ` [PATCH 1/7] uprobes: Kill UPROBE_SKIP_SSTEP and can_skip_sstep() Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-01 1:41 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-04-01 15:39 ` David Long
2014-04-03 16:32 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2014-03-31 19:43 ` [PATCH 2/7] uprobes/x86: Fold prepare_fixups() into arch_uprobe_analyze_insn() Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-01 2:00 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-04-03 16:33 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2014-03-31 19:44 ` [PATCH 3/7] uprobes/x86: Conditionalize the usage of handle_riprel_insn() Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-01 3:17 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-04-01 14:33 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-01 16:39 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-02 17:57 ` Jim Keniston
2014-04-02 19:14 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-03-31 19:44 ` [PATCH 4/7] uprobes/x86: Kill the "ia32_compat" check in handle_riprel_insn(), remove "mm" arg Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-01 3:10 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-04-03 16:33 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2014-03-31 19:44 ` [PATCH 5/7] uprobes/x86: Gather "riprel" functions together Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-01 3:21 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-04-02 19:53 ` Jim Keniston
2014-04-03 19:50 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-03-31 19:44 ` [PATCH 6/7] uprobes/x86: move the UPROBE_FIX_{RIP,IP,CALL} code at the end of pre/post hooks Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-01 3:24 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-04-03 16:34 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2014-03-31 19:44 ` [PATCH 7/7] uprobes/x86: Introduce uprobe_xol_ops and arch_uprobe->ops Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-01 6:52 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-04-01 14:44 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-01 15:01 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-02 19:46 ` Jim Keniston
2014-04-03 19:49 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-02 19:58 ` [PATCH 0/7] uprobes/x86: introduce " Jim Keniston
2014-04-03 20:00 ` [PATCH 8-9/7] " Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-03 20:00 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2014-04-03 20:01 ` [PATCH 9/7] uprobes/x86: Teach arch_uprobe_post_xol() to restart if possible Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140403200053.GD12639@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
--cc=dave.long@linaro.org \
--cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
--cc=fche@redhat.com \
--cc=jkenisto@us.ibm.com \
--cc=jlebon@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).