From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752084AbaDDGNj (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Apr 2014 02:13:39 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f181.google.com ([209.85.212.181]:41381 "EHLO mail-wi0-f181.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751781AbaDDGNf (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Apr 2014 02:13:35 -0400 Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2014 08:13:32 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: "Li, Aubrey" , Steven Rostedt , Linus Torvalds , LKML , Thomas Gleixner , Matthew Garrett Subject: Re: [BUG] x86: reboot doesn't reboot Message-ID: <20140404061332.GA11877@gmail.com> References: <533D7C93.7080105@zytor.com> <20140403113921.23dceb75@gandalf.local.home> <533D8516.1040803@zytor.com> <20140403121314.246b03a7@gandalf.local.home> <533DED74.6050202@linux.intel.com> <20140403194018.7c67aec7@gandalf.local.home> <533DF455.4040908@linux.intel.com> <533DF8D2.9060508@zytor.com> <533E0A94.5040007@linux.intel.com> <091fb6ee-a7e1-4962-9382-7e3b14792797@email.android.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <091fb6ee-a7e1-4962-9382-7e3b14792797@email.android.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Keep in mind we already tried CF9 in the default flow and it broke > things. I'm willing to wait for reports about production machines, > though, but I fully expect them. Typically there's nothing particularly weird about preproduction Intel hardware when it comes to reboot methods, other than people more willing to test them with development kernels. Is there any system were the triple fault method does not work? Thanks, Ingo