linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>,
	Linux Containers <containers@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	cgroups@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] cgroup changes for v3.15-rc1
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2014 08:03:59 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140404120359.GA5461@mtj.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFw+jFdmmi6eZ6+RpLM9heyowfXsZxb6Y91GNkPU677PmA@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 01:02:45PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > The cgroup_root should be destroyed but it isn't, I think.  We'd need
> > to bump cgroup_root's refcnt only when a new sb is created.  It's
> > kinda ugly.  Hmmm...
> 
> Ok, so I guess we can use that "new_sb_created" thing, and I'll redo
> my merge resolution to reflect that. I do find this incredibly ugly.

I apparently missed the issue and designed the interface without
considering this ugliness.  Maybe kernfs could be made to wrap rather
than providing mount/kill_sb() functions and hide details about sb or
we can simply add fstype->umount() so that there's symmetry; however,
the problem is kernfs-specific and other kernfs users would have
single static backing store and won't need to care about this, so, for
now, I think what it's a ugly but acceptable compromise.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

  reply	other threads:[~2014-04-04 12:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-03 16:49 [GIT PULL] cgroup changes for v3.15-rc1 Tejun Heo
2014-04-03 18:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-04-03 18:24   ` Linus Torvalds
     [not found]     ` <CAOS58YMckmoCocguf9BC_Wxbn3D2Rx3MArhgozO9qCj4g=5aDw@mail.gmail.com>
2014-04-03 19:01       ` Linus Torvalds
2014-04-03 19:43         ` Tejun Heo
2014-04-03 20:02           ` Linus Torvalds
2014-04-04 12:03             ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2014-04-03 23:18           ` Eric W. Biederman
2014-04-04  9:14           ` Li Zefan
2014-04-04 12:22             ` Tejun Heo
2014-04-05  1:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-04-05  1:11   ` Linus Torvalds
2014-04-05  1:34     ` Linus Torvalds
2014-04-07 20:59       ` [PATCH cgroup/for-3.15-fixes] cgroup: newly created dirs and files should be owned by the creator Tejun Heo
2014-04-06 14:31     ` [GIT PULL] cgroup changes for v3.15-rc1 Markus Trippelsdorf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140404120359.GA5461@mtj.dyndns.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).