public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: "Toralf Förster" <toralf.foerster@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Michele Ballabio <barra_cuda@katamail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: Bisected KVM hang on x86-32 between v3.12 and v3.13
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 00:43:10 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140407224308.GD4106@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5343030C.3040004@gmx.de>

On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 09:57:00PM +0200, Toralf Förster wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
> 
> On 04/07/2014 08:59 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 08:16:24PM +0200, Toralf Förster wrote:
> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256
> >> 
> >> On 04/07/2014 05:07 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 05:03:37PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra
> >>> wrote:
> >>>> So what I suspect at this point is that because i386 and
> >>>> x86_64 have a difference in current_thread_info() (i386 is
> >>>> stack based), we end up setting the TIF_NEED_RESCHED bit on
> >>>> the wrong stack.
> >>>> 
> >>>> Now I have some vague memories of propagating the TIF flags
> >>>> on stack switch, but I cannot remember what arch we did that
> >>>> for. Let me stare at this a little more.
> >>>> 
> >>>> Also, IFF this is the case, then the fingered patch above
> >>>> (and your suggested 'fix') aren't the real curlpit/cure but
> >>>> simply make it more/less likely to happen.
> >>>> 
> >>>> Now, Steve had a patch somewhere that would make i386 use 
> >>>> per-cpu variables for current_thread_info() just like x86_64 
> >>>> already does I think. Let me go find them too.
> >>> 
> >>> Ohh, goodie, they're already in Linus' tree. Could you see if 
> >>> current git still suffers this problem?
> >>> 
> >> v3.14-10353-g2b3a8fd works fine AFAICS (BTW the fix is stable
> >> material, right ?)
> > 
> > If we are reffering to 198d208df4371734ac4728f69cb585c284d20a15 
> > (x86: Keep thread_info on thread stack in x86_32) it doesn't carry
> > a stable tag.
> > 
> > So to be clear, you are saying that v3.14 is fine but other
> > release are buggy? Which ones are these?
> > 
> No, 3.13.x and 3.14 have the issue, latest git is fine and 3.12.x
> 

Ah ok. Hmm, Peter seemed to have an idea on a fix to backport so I'll let
him handle that :)

Thanks.

  reply	other threads:[~2014-04-07 22:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-06 15:19 Bisected KVM hang on x86-32 between v3.12 and v3.13 Michele Ballabio
2014-04-06 15:52 ` Toralf Förster
2014-04-06 17:40   ` Michele Ballabio
2014-04-07 15:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-07 15:07   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-07 18:16     ` Toralf Förster
2014-04-07 18:56       ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-08 12:21         ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-08 19:14           ` Michele Ballabio
2014-04-08 19:51             ` Michele Ballabio
2014-04-08 20:28           ` Toralf Förster
2014-04-09  9:14           ` Stefan Bader
2014-04-09  9:45             ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-09 14:24               ` [PATCH -stable] x86,preempt: Fix preemption for i386 Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-09 14:36                 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-04-09 19:19                   ` Greg KH
2014-04-09 19:38                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-09 19:57                       ` Greg KH
2014-05-13 23:56                       ` Greg KH
2014-04-07 18:59       ` Bisected KVM hang on x86-32 between v3.12 and v3.13 Frederic Weisbecker
2014-04-07 19:57         ` Toralf Förster
2014-04-07 22:43           ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2014-04-07 19:49     ` Michele Ballabio

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140407224308.GD4106@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=barra_cuda@katamail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=toralf.foerster@gmx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox