From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@gmail.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Mauro Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] time: Fix truncation in jiffies_to_usecs()
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 20:56:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140408185609.GA14519@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140408141543.2de9449d@gandalf.local.home>
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 02:15:43PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Apr 2014 19:49:51 +0200
> Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 10:34:51PM -0700, Tony Luck wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 3:25 PM, Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > c) If not this ... then what? Separate routine to convert large numbers
> > > > of jiffies to usec/nsecs? Should we make the existing one barf when
> > > > handed a number that overflows?
> > >
> > > Having thought about this a bit more - I'm leaning towards leaving
> > > jiffies_to_usecs() alone, but using it as a model for a from-scratch
> > > implementation of:
> > > u64 jiffies_to_nsecs(const unsigned long j)
> > > {
> > > }
> > >
> > > This is what the uptime tracer actually needs - and there is only
> > > one user of jiffies_to_nsecs() to worry about.
> >
> > I'm not sure I get what you're trying to do. We already have jiffies_to_nsecs().
> > Anyway I'll just wait and check out the next patch :)
>
> I believe the issue is the way it's implemented:
>
> static inline u64 jiffies_to_nsecs(const unsigned long j)
> {
> return (u64)jiffies_to_usecs(j) * NSEC_PER_USEC;
> }
>
> The problem is with jiffies_to_usecs(). Which we probably should
> change.
>
> With HZ = 100,
> 1 second jiffies_to_usecs(100) = 1000,000.
> 1 minute jiffies_to_usec(6000) = 60,000,000.
> 1 hour jiffies_to_usecs(360000) = 3,600,000,000
> 1 hour 11 minutes 35 seconds -
> jiffies_to_usecs(429500) = 4,295,000,000
>
> 2^32 = 4294967296 < 4,295,000,000
>
> Overflow!
>
> That means after 1 hour, 11 minutes and 35 seconds, jiffies_to_usecs()
> will return a reset number. Time will go backwards. It doesn't matter
> what you typecast the return value of jiffies_to_usecs() to, the result
> is wrong.
Ah! Ok got it now.
> Actually, I like Tony's first patch. I really think jiffies_to_usecs()
> should return a u64 number.
Agreed it's way too error-prone. OTOH there are too many users to allow such a blind
broad conversion of its return type:
$ git grep jiffies_to_usecs | cut -f1 | wc -l
52
So it may indeed be a better idea to first create a standalone jiffies_to_nsecs().
It can then be used to deprecate and replace most (if not all) calls to jiffies_to_usecs()
altogether. Just the conversion must be made one by one to make sure that users can
handle that.
Of course a big fat comment on jiffies_to_usecs() to describe that it's unsafe
and deprecated would help a bit.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-08 18:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-07 22:25 [RFC PATCH] time: Fix truncation in jiffies_to_usecs() Tony Luck
2014-04-08 5:34 ` Tony Luck
2014-04-08 15:27 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-04-08 17:49 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-04-08 18:15 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-04-08 18:56 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2014-04-08 19:34 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-04-08 17:32 ` [PATCH] time: Provide full featured jiffies_to_nsecs() function Tony Luck
2014-04-09 16:53 ` Tony Luck
2014-05-09 21:46 ` Luck, Tony
2014-05-16 14:24 ` Shy Shuky
2014-05-16 17:17 ` Luck, Tony
2014-05-16 19:02 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-05-19 1:28 ` Xie XiuQi
2014-05-19 22:35 ` Luck, Tony
2014-06-28 11:56 ` Xie XiuQi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140408185609.GA14519@localhost.localdomain \
--to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.chehab@samsung.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tony.luck@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).