From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: konrad@kernel.org, david.vrabel@Citrix.com,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, keir@xen.org
Subject: Re: [XEN PATCH 1/2] hvm: Support more than 32 VCPUS when migrating.
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 11:27:06 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140409152706.GF5860@phenom.dumpdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <534529A40200007800007055@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 10:06:12AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 08.04.14 at 19:25, <konrad@kernel.org> wrote:
> > --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c
> > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c
> > @@ -3470,6 +3470,9 @@ static long hvm_vcpu_op(
> > case VCPUOP_stop_singleshot_timer:
> > case VCPUOP_register_vcpu_info:
> > case VCPUOP_register_vcpu_time_memory_area:
> > + case VCPUOP_down:
> > + case VCPUOP_up:
> > + case VCPUOP_is_up:
>
> This, if I checked it properly, leaves only VCPUOP_initialise,
> VCPUOP_send_nmi, and VCPUOP_get_physid disallowed for HVM.
> None of which look inherently bad to be used by HVM (but
> VCPUOP_initialise certainly would need closer checking), so I
> wonder whether either the wrapper shouldn't be dropped altogether
> or at least be converted from a white list approach to a black list one.
I was being conservative here because I did not want to allow the
other ones without at least testing it.
Perhaps that can be done as a seperate patch and this just as
a bug-fix?
>
> Jan
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-09 15:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1396859560.22845.4.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com>
2014-04-08 17:25 ` [PATCH] Fixes for more than 32 VCPUs migration for HVM guests (v1) konrad
2014-04-08 17:25 ` [XEN PATCH 1/2] hvm: Support more than 32 VCPUS when migrating konrad
2014-04-08 18:18 ` [Xen-devel] " Roger Pau Monné
2014-04-08 18:53 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-04-09 7:37 ` Roger Pau Monné
2014-04-09 15:34 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-04-09 15:38 ` David Vrabel
2014-04-09 15:55 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-04-09 8:33 ` Ian Campbell
2014-04-09 9:04 ` Roger Pau Monné
2014-04-09 9:06 ` Jan Beulich
2014-04-09 15:27 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2014-04-09 15:36 ` Jan Beulich
2014-04-22 18:34 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-04-23 8:57 ` Jan Beulich
2014-04-08 17:25 ` [LINUX PATCH 2/2] xen/pvhvm: Support more than 32 VCPUs " konrad
2014-04-09 8:03 ` Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140409152706.GF5860@phenom.dumpdata.com \
--to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=david.vrabel@Citrix.com \
--cc=keir@xen.org \
--cc=konrad@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox