From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: "Romer, Benjamin M" <Benjamin.Romer@unisys.com>
Cc: *S-Par-Maintainer <SParMaintainer@unisys.com>,
"jkc@redhat.com" <jkc@redhat.com>,
"devel@driverdev.osuosl.org" <devel@driverdev.osuosl.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] unisys: staging: Check for s-Par firmware before initializing s-Par modules
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 12:25:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140409192552.GA11506@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C97001BC43954D438ACB059713BA5CDF92040F0F09@USEA-EXCH7.na.uis.unisys.com>
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 02:04:50PM -0500, Romer, Benjamin M wrote:
> This patch adds a function, is_spar_system(), to check that s-Par
> firmware is present, and then uses this function at the beginning of
> each module to verify that the modules are being run on an s-Par system
> before beginning initialization. If the firmware is not detected, the
> module will return a failure code.
>
> Checking for s-Par firmware uses the cpuid instruction to verify that
> the processor is running with virtualization turned on, and then uses a
> second cpuid instruction to check that the hypervisor ID is
> "UnisysSpar64".
Why not use the cpuid infrastructure to automatically load/bind your
code and not rely on it being loaded "by hand"? Doesn't that work for
CPU types already?
> Additionally, some minor clean-up was done on copyright tags and
> unnecessary messages were removed from the visorchipset_main() function.
Patches need to do only one thing, so can you please split this up in to
multiple patches, each one only doing one thing.
> This patch was tested with KVM to ensure that the modules do not load
> when s-Par firmware is not present, and tested with s-Par 4.0.12 to
> verify that the modules load correctly when the firmware is present.
>
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Romer <benjamin.romer@unisys.com>
You forgot to add a "Reported-by:" line here, and possibly a
"Tested-by:" if someone tested it and reported that it solved the
problem. Proper attribution is very important.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-09 19:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-09 19:04 [PATCH] unisys: staging: Check for s-Par firmware before initializing s-Par modules Romer, Benjamin M
2014-04-09 19:25 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2014-04-10 14:56 ` Romer, Benjamin M
2014-04-09 19:27 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2014-04-09 19:43 ` Dan Carpenter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140409192552.GA11506@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=Benjamin.Romer@unisys.com \
--cc=SParMaintainer@unisys.com \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=jkc@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox