public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
	Anton Arapov <aarapov@redhat.com>,
	David Long <dave.long@linaro.org>,
	Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>,
	"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>,
	Jim Keniston <jkenisto@us.ibm.com>,
	Jonathan Lebon <jlebon@redhat.com>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 04/15] uprobes/x86: Gather "riprel" functions together
Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2014 19:45:36 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140413174536.GA11846@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140413174508.GA11811@redhat.com>

Cosmetic. Move pre_xol_rip_insn() and handle_riprel_post_xol() up to
the closely related handle_riprel_insn(). This way it is simpler to
read and understand this code, and this lessens the number of ifdef's.

While at it, update the comment in handle_riprel_post_xol() as Jim
suggested.

TODO: rename them somehow to make the naming consistent.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Keniston <jkenisto@us.ibm.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c |  118 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
 1 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c b/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
index 642c1a5..c982ea0 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
@@ -313,6 +313,48 @@ handle_riprel_insn(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct insn *insn)
 	}
 }
 
+/*
+ * If we're emulating a rip-relative instruction, save the contents
+ * of the scratch register and store the target address in that register.
+ */
+static void
+pre_xol_rip_insn(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct pt_regs *regs,
+				struct arch_uprobe_task *autask)
+{
+	if (auprobe->fixups & UPROBE_FIX_RIP_AX) {
+		autask->saved_scratch_register = regs->ax;
+		regs->ax = current->utask->vaddr;
+		regs->ax += auprobe->rip_rela_target_address;
+	} else if (auprobe->fixups & UPROBE_FIX_RIP_CX) {
+		autask->saved_scratch_register = regs->cx;
+		regs->cx = current->utask->vaddr;
+		regs->cx += auprobe->rip_rela_target_address;
+	}
+}
+
+static void
+handle_riprel_post_xol(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct pt_regs *regs, long *correction)
+{
+	if (auprobe->fixups & (UPROBE_FIX_RIP_AX | UPROBE_FIX_RIP_CX)) {
+		struct arch_uprobe_task *autask;
+
+		autask = &current->utask->autask;
+		if (auprobe->fixups & UPROBE_FIX_RIP_AX)
+			regs->ax = autask->saved_scratch_register;
+		else
+			regs->cx = autask->saved_scratch_register;
+
+		/*
+		 * The original instruction includes a displacement, and so
+		 * is 4 bytes longer than what we've just single-stepped.
+		 * Caller may need to apply other fixups to handle stuff
+		 * like "jmpq *...(%rip)" and "callq *...(%rip)".
+		 */
+		if (correction)
+			*correction += 4;
+	}
+}
+
 static int validate_insn_64bits(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct insn *insn)
 {
 	insn_init(insn, auprobe->insn, true);
@@ -339,9 +381,19 @@ static int validate_insn_bits(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct mm_struct *mm,
 	return validate_insn_64bits(auprobe, insn);
 }
 #else /* 32-bit: */
+/*
+ * No RIP-relative addressing on 32-bit
+ */
 static void handle_riprel_insn(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct insn *insn)
 {
-	/* No RIP-relative addressing on 32-bit */
+}
+static void pre_xol_rip_insn(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct pt_regs *regs,
+				struct arch_uprobe_task *autask)
+{
+}
+static void handle_riprel_post_xol(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct pt_regs *regs,
+					long *correction)
+{
 }
 
 static int validate_insn_bits(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct mm_struct *mm,  struct insn *insn)
@@ -415,34 +467,6 @@ int arch_uprobe_analyze_insn(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct mm_struct *mm,
 	return 0;
 }
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
-/*
- * If we're emulating a rip-relative instruction, save the contents
- * of the scratch register and store the target address in that register.
- */
-static void
-pre_xol_rip_insn(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct pt_regs *regs,
-				struct arch_uprobe_task *autask)
-{
-	if (auprobe->fixups & UPROBE_FIX_RIP_AX) {
-		autask->saved_scratch_register = regs->ax;
-		regs->ax = current->utask->vaddr;
-		regs->ax += auprobe->rip_rela_target_address;
-	} else if (auprobe->fixups & UPROBE_FIX_RIP_CX) {
-		autask->saved_scratch_register = regs->cx;
-		regs->cx = current->utask->vaddr;
-		regs->cx += auprobe->rip_rela_target_address;
-	}
-}
-#else
-static void
-pre_xol_rip_insn(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct pt_regs *regs,
-				struct arch_uprobe_task *autask)
-{
-	/* No RIP-relative addressing on 32-bit */
-}
-#endif
-
 /*
  * arch_uprobe_pre_xol - prepare to execute out of line.
  * @auprobe: the probepoint information.
@@ -492,42 +516,6 @@ static int adjust_ret_addr(unsigned long sp, long correction)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
-static bool is_riprel_insn(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe)
-{
-	return ((auprobe->fixups & (UPROBE_FIX_RIP_AX | UPROBE_FIX_RIP_CX)) != 0);
-}
-
-static void
-handle_riprel_post_xol(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct pt_regs *regs, long *correction)
-{
-	if (is_riprel_insn(auprobe)) {
-		struct arch_uprobe_task *autask;
-
-		autask = &current->utask->autask;
-		if (auprobe->fixups & UPROBE_FIX_RIP_AX)
-			regs->ax = autask->saved_scratch_register;
-		else
-			regs->cx = autask->saved_scratch_register;
-
-		/*
-		 * The original instruction includes a displacement, and so
-		 * is 4 bytes longer than what we've just single-stepped.
-		 * Fall through to handle stuff like "jmpq *...(%rip)" and
-		 * "callq *...(%rip)".
-		 */
-		if (correction)
-			*correction += 4;
-	}
-}
-#else
-static void
-handle_riprel_post_xol(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct pt_regs *regs, long *correction)
-{
-	/* No RIP-relative addressing on 32-bit */
-}
-#endif
-
 /*
  * If xol insn itself traps and generates a signal(Say,
  * SIGILL/SIGSEGV/etc), then detect the case where a singlestepped
-- 
1.5.5.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-04-13 17:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-13 17:45 [PATCH v3 00/15] uprobes/x86: fix the handling of relative jmp's/call's Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-13 17:45 ` [PATCH v3 01/15] uprobes: Kill UPROBE_SKIP_SSTEP and can_skip_sstep() Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-13 17:45 ` [PATCH v3 02/15] uprobes/x86: Fold prepare_fixups() into arch_uprobe_analyze_insn() Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-13 17:45 ` [PATCH v3 03/15] uprobes/x86: Kill the "ia32_compat" check in handle_riprel_insn(), remove "mm" arg Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-13 17:45 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2014-04-13 17:45 ` [PATCH v3 05/15] uprobes/x86: move the UPROBE_FIX_{RIP,IP,CALL} code at the end of pre/post hooks Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-13 17:45 ` [PATCH v3 06/15] uprobes/x86: Introduce uprobe_xol_ops and arch_uprobe->ops Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-13 17:45 ` [PATCH v3 07/15] uprobes/x86: Conditionalize the usage of handle_riprel_insn() Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-13 17:45 ` [PATCH v3 08/15] uprobes/x86: Send SIGILL if arch_uprobe_post_xol() fails Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-13 17:45 ` [PATCH v3 09/15] uprobes/x86: Teach arch_uprobe_post_xol() to restart if possible Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-13 17:45 ` [PATCH v3 10/15] uprobes/x86: Introduce sizeof_long(), cleanup adjust_ret_addr() and arch_uretprobe_hijack_return_addr() Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-13 17:46 ` [PATCH v3 11/15] uprobes/x86: Emulate unconditional relative jmp's Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-13 17:46 ` [PATCH v3 12/15] uprobes/x86: Emulate nop's using ops->emulate() Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-13 17:46 ` [PATCH v3 13/15] uprobes/x86: Emulate relative call's Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-13 17:46 ` [PATCH v3 14/15] uprobes/x86: Emulate relative conditional "short" jmp's Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-13 17:46 ` [PATCH v3 15/15] uprobes/x86: Emulate relative conditional "near" jmp's Oleg Nesterov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140413174536.GA11846@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=aarapov@redhat.com \
    --cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=dave.long@linaro.org \
    --cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
    --cc=fche@redhat.com \
    --cc=jkenisto@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=jlebon@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox