public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	mingo@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/core: fix formatting issues in sched_can_stop_tick()
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 00:48:18 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140414224815.GA1877@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140414183838.GF11182@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 08:38:38PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 09:47:41PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > sched_can_stop_tick() was using 7 spaces instead of 8 spaces or a 'tab' at the
> > beginning of each line. Which doesn't align with the Coding Guidelines.
> > 
> > Also it removes the *rq variable as it was used at only one place and hence we
> > can directly use this_rq() instead.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> > ---
> > I don't think rq = tihs_rq() has to be done before smp_mb(), in case yes sorry
> > for this patch :(
> > 
> >  kernel/sched/core.c | 16 ++++++----------
> >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> > index 268a45e..13299c5 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> > @@ -666,18 +666,14 @@ static inline bool got_nohz_idle_kick(void)
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL
> >  bool sched_can_stop_tick(void)
> >  {
> > +	/* Make sure rq->nr_running update is visible after the IPI */
> > +	smp_rmb();
> >  
> > +	/* More than one running task need preemption */
> > +	if (this_rq()->nr_running > 1)
> > +		return false;
> >  
> > +	return true;
> >  }
> >  #endif /* CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL */
> 
> AFAICT the smp_rmb() is entirely spurious, arch interrupts should ensure
> consistency on their own. That is:
> 
>   CPU 0		  CPU 1
> 
> [w] X = 1
>     IPI 1	    <int>
> 		[r] r = X
> 
> Should act as if there was a full memory barrier, making it so that the
> read on CPU1 observes the write on CPU0.

Right, I have a pending patch for that:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/frederic/linux-dynticks.git/commit/?h=nohz/ipi&id=ca981d9f87fe0f113ad972098cfe181180b3675a

  reply	other threads:[~2014-04-14 22:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-14 16:17 [PATCH] sched/core: fix formatting issues in sched_can_stop_tick() Viresh Kumar
2014-04-14 18:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-14 22:48   ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2014-04-15  3:59     ` Viresh Kumar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140414224815.GA1877@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox