From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: [regression, 3.15-rc1] vdso_gettimeofday hogs all my CPU
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 17:53:36 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140415075335.GE31578@dastard> (raw)
Hi Peter,
I'm guessing that x86 vdso problems are in your area of expertise,
if not can you point me at the right person to bug?
I just spun up my XFS performance tests on 3.15-rc1, the first of
which runs a concurrent fsmark workload. fsmark uses gettimeofday to
do per-operation timing and performance is horrendous. 3.14.0 on this
workload does around 300,000 file creates per second. 3.15-rc1
does:
# ./fs_mark -D 10000 -S0 -n 100000 -s 0 -L 32 -d /mnt/scratch/0 -d /mnt/scratch/1 -d /mnt/scratch/2 -d /mnt/scratch/3 -d /mnt/scratch/4 -d /mnt/scratch/5 -d /mnt/scratch/6 -d /mnt/scratch/7 -d /mnt/scratch/8 -d /mnt/scratch/9 -d /mnt/scratch/10 -d /mnt/scratch/11 -d /mnt/scratch/12 -d /mnt/scratch/13 -d /mnt/scratch/14 -d /mnt/scratch/15
# Version 3.3, 16 thread(s) starting at Tue Apr 15 17:37:20 2014
# Sync method: NO SYNC: Test does not issue sync() or fsync() calls.
# Directories: Time based hash between directories across 10000 subdirectories with 180 seconds per subdirectory.
# File names: 40 bytes long, (16 initial bytes of time stamp with 24 random bytes at end of name)
# Files info: size 0 bytes, written with an IO size of 16384 bytes per write
# App overhead is time in microseconds spent in the test not doing file writing related system calls.
FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead
0 1600000 0 70950.5 155219877
0 3200000 0 71832.4 150138649
0 4800000 0 71195.5 150935842
0 6400000 0 71215.4 150906768
0 8000000 0 63707.7 166569461
.....
about 70,000 files/sec, so it's way, way down on 3.14. The load has
pegged all 16 CPUs in the VM, and perf top tells me:
- 63.11% [vdso] [.] __vdso_gettimeofday
- __vdso_gettimeofday
44.24% stop
28.18% do_run
13.98% write_file
13.60% setup_file_name
that it's the gettimeofday calls that are causing the excessive CPU
load.
I haven't changed anything in userspace for the past couple of
months, the only thing that has changed is the kernel. I haven't
looked at this any further and have no idea what to do to debug it
further, so let me know if you need more information....
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
next reply other threads:[~2014-04-15 7:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-15 7:53 Dave Chinner [this message]
2014-04-15 8:11 ` [regression, 3.15-rc1] vdso_gettimeofday hogs all my CPU Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140415075335.GE31578@dastard \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox