From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Fernando Luis Vazquez Cao <fernando_b1@lab.ntt.co.jp>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] nohz: use delayed iowait accounting to avoid race on idle time stats
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 12:19:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140415101910.GN11096@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <534660D2.1080505@jp.fujitsu.com>
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 06:13:54PM +0900, Hidetoshi Seto wrote:
> [WHAT THIS PATCH PROPOSED]:
>
> To fix problem 1, this patch adds seqcount for NO_HZ idle
> accounting to avoid possible races between reader/writer.
>
> And to cope with problem 2, I introduced delayed iowait
> accounting to get approximate value without making observers
> to writers. Refer comment in patch for the detail.
> --- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> @@ -407,15 +407,42 @@ static void tick_nohz_stop_idle(struct tick_sched *ts, ktime_t now)
> {
> ktime_t delta;
>
> + write_seqcount_begin(&ts->idle_sleeptime_seq);
> +
> /* Updates the per cpu time idle statistics counters */
> delta = ktime_sub(now, ts->idle_entrytime);
> +
> + /*
> + * Perform delayed iowait accounting:
> + *
> + * We account sleep time as iowait when nr_iowait of cpu indicates
> + * there are taskes blocked by io, at the end of idle (=here).
> + * It means we can not determine whether the sleep time will be idle
> + * or iowait on the fly.
> + * Therefore introduce a new rule:
> + * - basically observers assign delta to idle
> + * - if cpu find nr_iowait>0 at idle exit, accumulate delta as missed
> + * iowait, and account it in next turn of sleep instead.
> + * - if observer find accumulated iowait while cpu is in sleep, it
> + * can calculate proper value to be accounted.
> + */
> + if (ktime_compare(ts->iowait_pending, delta) > 0) {
> ts->iowait_sleeptime = ktime_add(ts->iowait_sleeptime, delta);
> + ts->iowait_pending = ktime_sub(ts->iowait_pending, delta);
> + } else {
> + ts->idle_sleeptime = ktime_add(ts->idle_sleeptime,
> + ktime_sub(delta, ts->iowait_pending));
> + ts->iowait_sleeptime = ktime_add(ts->iowait_sleeptime,
> + ts->iowait_pending);
> + ts->iowait_pending = ktime_set(0, 0);
> + }
> + if (nr_iowait_cpu(smp_processor_id()) > 0)
> + ts->iowait_pending = ktime_add(ts->iowait_pending, delta);
> +
> ts->idle_active = 0;
>
> + write_seqcount_end(&ts->idle_sleeptime_seq);
> +
> sched_clock_idle_wakeup_event(0);
> }
Why!? Both changelog and comment are silent on this. This doesn't appear
to make any sense nor really solve anything.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-15 10:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-10 9:07 [PATCH v3 0/2] nohz: fix idle accounting in NO_HZ kernels Hidetoshi Seto
2014-04-10 9:11 ` [PATCH 1/2] nohz: stop updating sleep stats from get_cpu_{idle,iowait}_time_us() Hidetoshi Seto
2014-04-15 8:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-15 8:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-10 9:13 ` [PATCH 2/2] nohz: use delayed iowait accounting to avoid race on idle time stats Hidetoshi Seto
2014-04-15 10:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-16 6:30 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2014-04-15 10:19 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2014-04-16 6:33 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2014-04-16 9:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-17 0:42 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2014-04-17 10:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-17 10:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-18 5:52 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2014-04-18 8:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-15 3:11 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] nohz: fix idle accounting in NO_HZ kernels Hidetoshi Seto
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140415101910.GN11096@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=fernando_b1@lab.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
--cc=preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vda.linux@googlemail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox