public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Marek Mahut <mmahut@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 04/11] signals: rename rm_from_queue_full() to flush_sigqueue_mask()
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 20:28:38 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140415182838.GA12821@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140414150221.b62ccb9fb9056527c565872f@linux-foundation.org>

On 04/14, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> On Mon, 14 Apr 2014 17:19:59 +0200 Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > "rm_from_queue_full" looks ugly and misleading, especially now that
> > rm_from_queue() has gone away. Rename it to flush_sigqueue_mask(),
> > this matches flush_sigqueue() we already have.
> >
> > Also remove the obsolete comment which explains the difference with
> > rm_from_queue() we already killed.
> >
>
> Confused.  You sent 0..11 on March 24 and today you resent just 4, 5,
> 10 and 11.  If they're supposed to be replacement versions then please
> explain this!

No, no, this is another case when my emails go to nowhere :[

Marek, perhaps you can take a look ;)

> Anyway, emails are cheap and nobody reads lkml so please just resend
> everything ;)

Yes, will resend the whole series, thanks.

Oleg.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-04-15 18:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20140414151929.GA21470@redhat.com>
2014-04-14 15:19 ` [PATCH RESEND 04/11] signals: rename rm_from_queue_full() to flush_sigqueue_mask() Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-14 22:02   ` Andrew Morton
2014-04-15  7:40     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-15  7:45       ` Andrew Morton
2014-04-15 18:28     ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2014-04-14 15:20 ` [PATCH RESEND 05/11] signals: cleanup the usage of t/current in do_sigaction() Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-14 15:20 ` [PATCH RESEND 06/11] signals: mv {dis,}allow_signal() from sched.h/exit.c to signal.[ch] Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-14 15:20 ` [PATCH RESEND 07/11] signals: jffs2: fix the wrong usage of disallow_signal() Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-14 22:09   ` Andrew Morton
2014-04-14 15:20 ` [PATCH RESEND 08/11] signals: kill the obsolete sigdelset() and recalc_sigpending() in allow_signal() Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-14 15:20 ` [PATCH RESEND 09/11] signals: disallow_signal() should flush the potentially pending signal Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-14 15:20 ` [PATCH RESEND 10/11] signals: introduce kernel_sigaction() Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-14 15:20 ` [PATCH RESEND 11/11] signals: change wait_for_helper() to use kernel_sigaction() Oleg Nesterov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140415182838.GA12821@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mmahut@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox