From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Satoru MORIYA <satoru.moriya.br@hitachi.com>,
Yoshihiro YUNOMAE <yoshihiro.yunomae.ez@hitachi.com>,
Takenori Nagano <t-nagano@ah.jp.nec.com>,
Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Motohiro Kosaki <Motohiro.Kosaki@us.fujitsu.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel/panic: Add "late_kdump" option for kdump in unstable condition
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 09:48:30 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140416134830.GA31074@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140414045158.10846.35462.stgit@ltc230.yrl.intra.hitachi.co.jp>
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 01:51:58PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> Add a "late_kdump" option to run kdump after running panic
> notifiers and dump kmsg. This can help rare situations which
> kdump drops in failure because of unstable crashed kernel
> or hardware failure (memory corruption on critical data/code),
> or the 2nd kernel is broken by the 1st kernel (it's a broken
> behavior, but who can guarantee that the "crashed" kernel
> works correctly?).
>
> Usage: add "late_kdump" to kernel boot option. That's all.
>
> Note that this actually increases risks of the failure of
> kdump. This option should be set only if you worry about
> the rare case of kdump failure rather than increasing the
> chance of success.
>
> Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
> Cc: Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
> Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Yoshihiro YUNOMAE <yoshihiro.yunomae.ez@hitachi.com>
> Cc: Satoru MORIYA <satoru.moriya.br@hitachi.com>
> Cc: Motohiro Kosaki <Motohiro.Kosaki@us.fujitsu.com>
> Cc: Takenori Nagano <t-nagano@ah.jp.nec.com>
> ---
> Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt | 7 +++++++
> kernel/panic.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
> index 03e50b4..1ba58da 100644
> --- a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
> @@ -2339,6 +2339,13 @@ bytes respectively. Such letter suffixes can also be entirely omitted.
> timeout < 0: reboot immediately
> Format: <timeout>
>
> + late_kdump Run kdump after running panic-notifiers and dumping
> + kmsg. This only for the users who doubt kdump always
> + succeeds in any situation.
> + Note that this also increases risks of kdump failure,
> + because some panic notifiers can make the crashed
> + kernel more unstable.
> +
I am wondering if "crash_kexec_post_notifiers" will be a better name
to represent what we are trying to do here.
> parkbd.port= [HW] Parallel port number the keyboard adapter is
> connected to, default is 0.
> Format: <parport#>
> diff --git a/kernel/panic.c b/kernel/panic.c
> index d02fa9f..bba42b5 100644
> --- a/kernel/panic.c
> +++ b/kernel/panic.c
> @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ static unsigned long tainted_mask;
> static int pause_on_oops;
> static int pause_on_oops_flag;
> static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(pause_on_oops_lock);
> +static bool late_kdump;
>
> int panic_timeout = CONFIG_PANIC_TIMEOUT;
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(panic_timeout);
> @@ -112,9 +113,14 @@ void panic(const char *fmt, ...)
> /*
> * If we have crashed and we have a crash kernel loaded let it handle
> * everything else.
> - * Do we want to call this before we try to display a message?
> + * If we want to call this after we try to display a message, pass
> + * the "late_kdump" option to the kernel.
> */
> - crash_kexec(NULL);
> + if (!late_kdump)
> + crash_kexec(NULL);
> + else
> + pr_emerg("Warning: late_kdump option is set. Please DO NOT "
> + "report bugs about kdump failure with this option.\n");
I think above message about DO NOT report bugs seems unnecessary.
Thanks
Vivek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-16 13:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-14 4:51 [PATCH] kernel/panic: Add "late_kdump" option for kdump in unstable condition Masami Hiramatsu
2014-04-14 5:14 ` Eric W. Biederman
2014-04-14 6:13 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-04-14 12:48 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-04-14 19:31 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-04-15 1:37 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-04-15 14:08 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-04-16 1:28 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-04-16 2:33 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-04-16 4:50 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-04-16 13:48 ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2014-04-17 1:59 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-04-17 13:43 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-04-18 3:09 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-04-21 0:59 ` Masami Hiramatsu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140416134830.GA31074@redhat.com \
--to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=Motohiro.Kosaki@us.fujitsu.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
--cc=satoru.moriya.br@hitachi.com \
--cc=t-nagano@ah.jp.nec.com \
--cc=yoshihiro.yunomae.ez@hitachi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox