linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org, tj@kernel.org,
	grygorii.strashko@ti.com, peterz@infradead.org
Subject: Re: How do I increment a per-CPU variable without warning?
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 11:47:55 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140416184755.GY4496@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1404161328410.21030@gentwo.org>

On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 01:29:21PM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Apr 2014, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 09:06:21AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 10:08:03AM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 15 Apr 2014, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hello, Christoph,
> > > > >
> > > > > I have a patch that currently uses __this_cpu_inc_return() to increment a
> > > > > per-CPU variable, but without preemption disabled.  Of course, given that
> > > > > preemption is enabled, it might well end up picking up one CPU's counter,
> > > > > adding one to it, then storing the result into some other CPU's counter.
> > > > > But this is OK, the test can be probabilistic.  And when I run this
> > > > > against v3.14 and earlier, it works fine.
> > > >
> > > > We introduced raw_cpu_inc_return to squish these warnings.
> > >
> > > Cool, this is a good short-term fix.
> >
> > Or at least it is given the following patch.  Was this the intent?
> 
> Correct. Thanks for the fix.
> 
> Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>

Queued, thank you.  I don't need this until 3.16, but I am tempted
to push it in this cycle in case others need it.  Any objections?

 							Thanx, Paul

> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > percpu: Fix raw_cpu_inc_return()
> >
> > The definition for raw_cpu_add_return() uses the operation prefix
> > "raw_add_return_", but the definitions in the various percpu.h files
> > expect "raw_cpu_add_return_".  This commit therefore appropriately
> > adjusts the definition of raw_cpu_add_return().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/percpu.h b/include/linux/percpu.h
> > index e7a0b95ed527..495c6543a8f2 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/percpu.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/percpu.h
> > @@ -639,7 +639,7 @@ do {									\
> >  #  define raw_cpu_add_return_8(pcp, val)	raw_cpu_generic_add_return(pcp, val)
> >  # endif
> >  # define raw_cpu_add_return(pcp, val)	\
> > -	__pcpu_size_call_return2(raw_add_return_, pcp, val)
> > +	__pcpu_size_call_return2(raw_cpu_add_return_, pcp, val)
> >  #endif
> >
> >  #define raw_cpu_sub_return(pcp, val)	raw_cpu_add_return(pcp, -(typeof(pcp))(val))
> >
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2014-04-16 18:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-15 22:17 How do I increment a per-CPU variable without warning? Paul E. McKenney
2014-04-15 22:29 ` Dave Jones
2014-04-15 22:47   ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-04-16  3:54     ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-04-16  5:21       ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-16 13:03         ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-04-16 15:12         ` Christoph Lameter
2014-04-16  5:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-16 15:08 ` Christoph Lameter
2014-04-16 16:06   ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-04-16 17:12     ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-04-16 18:29       ` Christoph Lameter
2014-04-16 18:47         ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2014-04-17 17:36           ` Christoph Lameter
2014-04-17 17:46             ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-04-17 17:53               ` Christoph Lameter
2014-04-17 18:21                 ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140416184755.GY4496@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=grygorii.strashko@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).