From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] workqueue: rescuer_thread() processes all pwqs before exit
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 12:08:28 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140417160828.GP15326@htj.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACvQF527RneJwUXf0=C6L0_9ncdS6--iqhdpWAFKqHtd25LOYg@mail.gmail.com>
Hello, Lai.
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 12:04:29AM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> > I don't think this is reliable. What if mayday requests take place
> > between wq_mayday_lock and kthread_should_stop() check? We'll
> > probably need to run through mayday list after checking should_stop.
>
> It is destroy_workqueue()'s responsibility to avoid this.
> destroy_workqueue() should drain all works and refuse any new work queued
> on the wq before destroy the wq.
>
> So since there is no works, there is no new mayday request,
> and there is no mayday request take place between wq_mayday_lock
> and kthread_should_stop() check.
Hmmm? Isn't this the same race condition that you tried to remove by
relocating the test? It doesn't matter what destroy_workqueue() does,
the rescuer may get preempted inbetween and anything can happen
inbetween including someone maydaying and initiation of
destroy_workqueue(). Your patch doesn't change the situation at all.
It can still return with non-empty mayday list.
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-17 16:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-27 16:20 [PATCH] workqueue: fix possible race condition when rescuer VS pwq-release Lai Jiangshan
2014-03-28 12:07 ` [PATCH V2] " Lai Jiangshan
2014-03-31 14:40 ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-03-31 20:06 ` Tejun Heo
2014-04-14 7:02 ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-04-15 16:47 ` Tejun Heo
2014-04-16 1:25 ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-04-16 15:23 ` Tejun Heo
2014-04-16 16:21 ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-04-16 16:50 ` Tejun Heo
2014-04-16 22:35 ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-04-16 23:34 ` [PATCH 1/2] workqueue: rescuer_thread() processes all pwqs before exit Lai Jiangshan
2014-04-16 23:34 ` [PATCH 2/2] workqueue: fix possible race condition when rescuer VS pwq-release Lai Jiangshan
2014-04-17 15:27 ` [PATCH 1/2] workqueue: rescuer_thread() processes all pwqs before exit Tejun Heo
2014-04-17 16:04 ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-04-17 16:08 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2014-04-17 16:21 ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-04-17 16:27 ` Tejun Heo
2014-04-18 13:25 ` [PATCH 1/2 V4] " Lai Jiangshan
2014-04-18 13:25 ` [PATCH 2/2 V4] workqueue: fix possible race condition when rescuer VS pwq-release Lai Jiangshan
2014-04-18 15:06 ` [PATCH 2/2] workqueue: fix a possible race condition between rescuer and pwq-release Tejun Heo
2014-04-18 16:24 ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-04-18 16:35 ` Tejun Heo
2014-04-18 15:06 ` [PATCH 1/2] workqueue: make rescuer_thread() empty wq->maydays list before exiting Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140417160828.GP15326@htj.dyndns.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).