public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: "Yan, Zheng" <zheng.z.yan@intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl,
	acme@infradead.org, eranian@google.com, andi@firstfloor.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] perf/x86/uncore: modularize Intel uncore driver
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 12:53:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140418105354.GA29167@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1395295426-12391-1-git-send-email-zheng.z.yan@intel.com>


* Yan, Zheng <zheng.z.yan@intel.com> wrote:

> This patch adds support for building Intel uncore driver as module.
> It adds clean-up code and config option for the Intel uncore driver
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yan, Zheng <zheng.z.yan@intel.com>
> ---
> Changes since v1:
>  move config option to "General setup/Kernel Performance Events and Counters"
> 
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile                  |  3 +-
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  init/Kconfig                                  | 10 ++++++
>  3 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile
> index 7fd54f0..5d3da70 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile
> @@ -36,7 +36,8 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_SUP_AMD)		+= perf_event_amd_iommu.o
>  endif
>  obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_SUP_INTEL)		+= perf_event_p6.o perf_event_knc.o perf_event_p4.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_SUP_INTEL)		+= perf_event_intel_lbr.o perf_event_intel_ds.o perf_event_intel.o
> -obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_SUP_INTEL)		+= perf_event_intel_uncore.o perf_event_intel_rapl.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_SUP_INTEL)		+= perf_event_intel_rapl.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_PERF_X86_INTEL_UNCORE)	+= perf_event_intel_uncore.o
>  endif
>  
>  
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c
> index 618d502..fd5e883 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c

So I'm not willing to apply this patch until the documentation of 
perf_event_intel_uncore.c is improved. Right now the file starts 
without a single comment (!). Just lines after lines of code, without 
any explanation what it does, what its scope is, etc.

How should even a knowledgable user know about what it's all about?

That problem percolates to the Kconfig entry as well:

> --- a/init/Kconfig
> +++ b/init/Kconfig
> @@ -1502,6 +1502,16 @@ config PERF_EVENTS
>  
>  	  Say Y if unsure.
>  
> +config PERF_X86_INTEL_UNCORE
> +	default y
> +	tristate "Intel uncore performance monitoring support"
> +	depends on PERF_EVENTS && CPU_SUP_INTEL && PCI
> +	help
> +	  This option allows kernel to access the Uncore performance
> +	  monitoring units of Intel processors.
> +
> +	  Say Y if unsure.

Firstly, it should probably not be 'default y'.

Secondly, the description is essentially non-existent. What does the 
hardware do? Why should users care about uncore PMUs?

This needs to be fixed before we can make this modular.

Thanks,

	Ingo

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-04-18 10:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-03-20  6:03 [PATCH v2 4/4] perf/x86/uncore: modularize Intel uncore driver Yan, Zheng
2014-03-20  8:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-18 10:53 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2014-04-18 16:49   ` Andi Kleen
2014-04-21  2:18   ` Yan, Zheng
2014-04-22 11:35     ` Ingo Molnar
2014-04-23 14:55       ` Stephane Eranian
2014-04-24  8:14         ` Ingo Molnar
2014-04-24 10:25           ` Yan, Zheng
2014-04-24 10:36             ` Stephane Eranian
2014-04-24 10:37               ` Yan, Zheng
2014-04-24 11:27               ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-25 13:17                 ` Yan, Zheng
2014-04-25 13:55                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-25 14:06                     ` Yan, Zheng
2014-04-25 14:35                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-25 14:44                         ` Yan, Zheng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140418105354.GA29167@gmail.com \
    --to=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=acme@infradead.org \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=zheng.z.yan@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox