From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752589AbaDUNZv (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Apr 2014 09:25:51 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:15721 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751734AbaDUNZt (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Apr 2014 09:25:49 -0400 Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2014 15:25:43 +0200 From: Oleg Nesterov To: Avi Kivity , Gleb Natapov , Paolo Bonzini Cc: Dominik Dingel , Christian Borntraeger , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH 0/2] KVM: async_pf: use_mm/mm_users fixes Message-ID: <20140421132543.GA13594@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello. Completely untested and I know nothing about kvm ;) Please review. But use_mm() really looks misleading, and the usage of mm_users looks "obviously wrong". I already sent this change while we were discussing vmacache, but it was ignored. Since then kvm_async_page_present_sync() was added into async_pf_execute() into async_pf_execute(), but it seems to me that use_mm() is still unnecessary. Oleg. virt/kvm/async_pf.c | 10 ++++------ 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)