From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
Cc: Sangbeom Kim <sbkim73@samsung.com>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mfd: sec-core: Remove duplicated device type from sec_pmic
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 09:09:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140422080939.GE17657@lee--X1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1397807684.29800.8.camel@AMDC1943>
> > > + unsigned long device_type;
> > > int ret;
> > >
> > > sec_pmic = devm_kzalloc(&i2c->dev, sizeof(struct sec_pmic_dev),
> > > @@ -262,7 +263,7 @@ static int sec_pmic_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c,
> > > sec_pmic->dev = &i2c->dev;
> > > sec_pmic->i2c = i2c;
> > > sec_pmic->irq = i2c->irq;
> > > - sec_pmic->type = sec_i2c_get_driver_data(i2c, id);
> > > + device_type = sec_i2c_get_driver_data(i2c, id);
> >
> > Better to change the return type of 'sec_i2c_get_driver_data()' than
> > to rely on a cast later on.
>
> Hmmm... it was like that before Pankaj Dubey change (8f695de515b9).
> Solving that issue (-Wpointer-to-int-cast) along with keeping 'int' as
> return type of sec_i2c_get_driver_data would lead to one of:
> 1. Using temporary variable in ec_i2c_get_driver_data just for cast.
>
> static inline int sec_i2c_get_driver_data(struct i2c_client *i2c,
> const struct i2c_device_id *id)
> {
> unsigned long type;
>
> if (i2c->dev.of_node) {
> const struct of_device_id *match;
> match = of_match_node(sec_dt_match, i2c->dev.of_node);
> type = (unsigned long)match->data;
> }
> type = id->driver_data;
>
> return (int)type;
> }
>
> or
> 2. Double cast: (int)(unsigned long)match->data;
>
> For me both are kind a ugly... What do you think?
I'm saying, why don't you change everything; the return value of
sec_i2c_get_driver_data(), pdata->device_type and device_type to long
or unsigned long? Then the only cast you need to do is from void*.
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-22 8:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-14 12:03 [PATCH 1/2] mfd: sec-core: Remove duplicated device type from sec_pmic Krzysztof Kozlowski
2014-04-14 12:03 ` [PATCH 2/2] mfd: sec-core: Update sec_pmic documentation Krzysztof Kozlowski
2014-04-17 8:32 ` Lee Jones
2014-04-18 7:59 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2014-04-17 8:26 ` [PATCH 1/2] mfd: sec-core: Remove duplicated device type from sec_pmic Lee Jones
2014-04-18 7:54 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2014-04-22 8:09 ` Lee Jones [this message]
2014-04-22 8:41 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140422080939.GE17657@lee--X1 \
--to=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
--cc=k.kozlowski@samsung.com \
--cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
--cc=sbkim73@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox