From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754731AbaDVI4H (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Apr 2014 04:56:07 -0400 Received: from mail-ee0-f52.google.com ([74.125.83.52]:56692 "EHLO mail-ee0-f52.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752225AbaDVI4A (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Apr 2014 04:56:00 -0400 From: Pali =?utf-8?q?Roh=C3=A1r?= To: Dan Carpenter Subject: Re: [PATCH] radio-bcm2048.c: fix wrong overflow check Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 10:55:53 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.15.0-031500rc2-generic; KDE/4.12.3; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Pavel Machek , hans.verkuil@cisco.com, m.chehab@samsung.com, ext-eero.nurkkala@nokia.com, nils.faerber@kernelconcepts.de, joni.lapilainen@gmail.com, freemangordon@abv.bg, sre@ring0.de, Greg KH , trivial@kernel.org, kernel list References: <20140420145622.GA15567@amd.pavel.ucw.cz> <20140422083917.GS4963@mwanda> In-Reply-To: <20140422083917.GS4963@mwanda> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart60794447.sEMikDXT4R"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201404221055.54799@pali> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --nextPart60794447.sEMikDXT4R Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tuesday 22 April 2014 10:39:17 Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 04:56:22PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > > Fix wrong overflow check in radio-bcm2048. > >=20 > > Signed-off-by: Pali Roh=C3=A1r > > Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek >=20 > Signed off means like you're signing a legal document to show > that you didn't do anything illegal when you handled the > patch. Was this patch authored by Pali? If so, then use the > From: header. >=20 > Btw, I reported this bug on Dec 10 last year. It's better > that we fix it now than not fix it at all but we could have > done better. Was the kbuild-zero-day bug report format > confusing or how could I have helped out there? >=20 > regards, > dan carpenter Hello, I sent this patch months ago, but not generated by=20 commmand git format-patch. And yes, this problem was reported by=20 some public static code checker. =2D-=20 Pali Roh=C3=A1r pali.rohar@gmail.com --nextPart60794447.sEMikDXT4R Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAlNWLpoACgkQi/DJPQPkQ1KYDwCgvUQzCV60whWkJDlXwlDgX9lT GlcAoIFlj7W2EogMbNErbEKTYQKrGxPh =/VdT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart60794447.sEMikDXT4R--