From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
To: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
Cc: "linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"arnd@arndb.de" <arnd@arndb.de>,
"dhowells@redhat.com" <dhowells@redhat.com>,
"broonie@linaro.org" <broonie@linaro.org>,
"benh@kernel.crashing.org" <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
"peterz@infradead.org" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/18] asm-generic: io: define relaxed accessor macros unconditionally
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 16:18:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140422151809.GF9820@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5356782A.9050809@monstr.eu>
Hi Michal,
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 03:09:46PM +0100, Michal Simek wrote:
> On 04/17/2014 03:44 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> > Now that no architectures using asm-generic/io.h define their own relaxed
> > accessors, the dummy definitions can be used unconditionally.
> >
> > Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> > Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
> > ---
> > include/asm-generic/io.h | 18 ------------------
> > 1 file changed, 18 deletions(-)
>
> Do we need this? I think there could be a need to overwrite them.
> Currently we are just lucky that architecture which uses asm-generic/io.h
> don't need to overwrite it.
> But I expect that all archs should use asm-generic/io.h to clean
> architecture io.h exactly I have done it for Microblaze.
I'm open to keeping the conditional definitions, but it introduces a
discrepancy with the non-relaxed versions, which are defined unconditionally
(although the underlying __raw_* accessors can be overridden).
Will
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-22 15:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-17 13:44 [PATCH 00/18] Cross-architecture definitions of relaxed MMIO accessors Will Deacon
2014-04-17 13:44 ` [PATCH 01/18] asm-generic: io: implement relaxed accessor macros as conditional wrappers Will Deacon
2014-04-17 13:44 ` [PATCH 02/18] microblaze: io: remove dummy relaxed accessor macros Will Deacon
2014-04-22 13:53 ` Michal Simek
2014-04-17 13:44 ` [PATCH 03/18] s390: io: remove dummy relaxed accessor macros for reads Will Deacon
2014-04-17 13:44 ` [PATCH 04/18] xtensa: " Will Deacon
2014-04-17 13:44 ` [PATCH 05/18] alpha: io: implement relaxed accessor macros for writes Will Deacon
2014-04-17 13:44 ` [PATCH 06/18] frv: io: implement dummy " Will Deacon
2014-04-17 13:44 ` [PATCH 07/18] cris: " Will Deacon
2014-04-22 13:47 ` Jesper Nilsson
2014-04-17 13:44 ` [PATCH 08/18] ia64: " Will Deacon
2014-04-17 13:44 ` [PATCH 09/18] m32r: " Will Deacon
2014-04-17 13:44 ` [PATCH 10/18] m68k: " Will Deacon
2014-04-17 16:07 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2014-04-17 13:44 ` [PATCH 11/18] mn10300: " Will Deacon
2014-04-17 13:44 ` [PATCH 12/18] parisc: " Will Deacon
2014-04-17 13:44 ` [PATCH 13/18] powerpc: " Will Deacon
2014-04-17 13:44 ` [PATCH 14/18] sparc: " Will Deacon
2014-04-17 13:44 ` [PATCH 15/18] tile: " Will Deacon
2014-04-17 14:52 ` Chris Metcalf
2014-04-17 13:44 ` [PATCH 16/18] x86: " Will Deacon
2014-04-22 16:08 ` Will Deacon
2014-05-21 1:53 ` Brian Norris
2014-05-21 9:22 ` Will Deacon
2014-04-17 13:44 ` [PATCH 17/18] documentation: memory-barriers: clarify relaxed io accessor semantics Will Deacon
2014-04-17 13:44 ` [PATCH 18/18] asm-generic: io: define relaxed accessor macros unconditionally Will Deacon
2014-04-22 14:09 ` Michal Simek
2014-04-22 15:18 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2014-04-23 7:12 ` Michal Simek
2014-04-23 7:23 ` Sam Ravnborg
2014-04-23 7:36 ` Michal Simek
2014-04-17 14:00 ` [PATCH 00/18] Cross-architecture definitions of relaxed MMIO accessors Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-17 14:15 ` Will Deacon
2014-04-17 21:36 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2014-05-01 11:10 ` Will Deacon
2014-04-17 15:36 ` Sam Ravnborg
2014-04-17 15:47 ` Will Deacon
2014-04-17 19:15 ` Sam Ravnborg
2014-04-22 13:43 ` Will Deacon
2014-04-22 14:30 ` Sam Ravnborg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140422151809.GF9820@arm.com \
--to=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=broonie@linaro.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=monstr@monstr.eu \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).