From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753870AbaDVStT (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Apr 2014 14:49:19 -0400 Received: from mail-ee0-f50.google.com ([74.125.83.50]:32940 "EHLO mail-ee0-f50.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752957AbaDVStR (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Apr 2014 14:49:17 -0400 Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 20:49:10 +0200 From: Alexander Aring To: Johannes Berg Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" , "Luis R. Rodriguez" , alex.bluesman.smirnov@gmail.com, dbaryshkov@gmail.com, linux-zigbee-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, backports@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] 6lowpan: add helper to get 6lowpan namespace Message-ID: <20140422184908.GA16477@omega> References: <1397784176-15809-1-git-send-email-mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> <1397784176-15809-2-git-send-email-mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> <1398159886.4211.1.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> <20140422095300.GA9241@omega> <20140422175818.GN27882@wotan.suse.de> <1398192315.4211.25.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1398192315.4211.25.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 08:45:15PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Tue, 2014-04-22 at 19:58 +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > > > > > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IEEE802154_6LOWPAN) > > > > > [...] > > > > > +#else > > > > > +static inline struct netns_ieee802154_lowpan * > > > > > +net_ieee802154_lowpan(struct net *net) > > > > > +{ > > > > > + return NULL; > > > > > +} > > > > > +#endif > > > > > > > > Why would that be needed? If nobody compiles 802.15.4 then it seems > > > > nothing should reference it? > > > > > > > Indeed I think this is unnecessary, also. > > > > I wanted to be sure, and I was not. Right now 6lowpan does not depend > > on CONFIG_NET_NS, is this intentional? I think its fine without it > > but I was not sure. > > I fail to see how !CONFIG_LOWPAN is related CONFIG_NET_NS? > mhh, IEEE802154_6LOWPAN depends on IPV6 and I think IPV6 is related to CONFIG_NET_NS. - Alex