From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
Anton Arapov <aarapov@redhat.com>,
David Long <dave.long@linaro.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] uprobes/tracing: uprobe_perf_open() forgets to handle the error from uprobe_apply()
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 18:58:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140423165830.GA29493@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140423165808.GA29485@redhat.com>
uprobe_perf_open()->uprobe_apply() can fail, but this error is wrongly
ignored. Change uprobe_perf_open() to do uprobe_perf_close() and return
the error code in this case.
Change uprobe_perf_close() to propogate the error from uprobe_apply()
as well, although it should not fail.
The patch looks more complicated because it moves uprobe_perf_close()
up to make it visible to uprobe_perf_open().
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
---
kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
1 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
index 930e514..9aad3e2 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
@@ -1003,56 +1003,60 @@ uprobe_filter_event(struct trace_uprobe *tu, struct perf_event *event)
return __uprobe_perf_filter(&tu->filter, event->hw.tp_target->mm);
}
-static int uprobe_perf_open(struct trace_uprobe *tu, struct perf_event *event)
+static int uprobe_perf_close(struct trace_uprobe *tu, struct perf_event *event)
{
bool done;
write_lock(&tu->filter.rwlock);
if (event->hw.tp_target) {
- /*
- * event->parent != NULL means copy_process(), we can avoid
- * uprobe_apply(). current->mm must be probed and we can rely
- * on dup_mmap() which preserves the already installed bp's.
- *
- * attr.enable_on_exec means that exec/mmap will install the
- * breakpoints we need.
- */
+ list_del(&event->hw.tp_list);
done = tu->filter.nr_systemwide ||
- event->parent || event->attr.enable_on_exec ||
+ (event->hw.tp_target->flags & PF_EXITING) ||
uprobe_filter_event(tu, event);
- list_add(&event->hw.tp_list, &tu->filter.perf_events);
} else {
+ tu->filter.nr_systemwide--;
done = tu->filter.nr_systemwide;
- tu->filter.nr_systemwide++;
}
write_unlock(&tu->filter.rwlock);
if (!done)
- uprobe_apply(tu->inode, tu->offset, &tu->consumer, true);
+ return uprobe_apply(tu->inode, tu->offset, &tu->consumer, false);
return 0;
}
-static int uprobe_perf_close(struct trace_uprobe *tu, struct perf_event *event)
+static int uprobe_perf_open(struct trace_uprobe *tu, struct perf_event *event)
{
bool done;
+ int err;
write_lock(&tu->filter.rwlock);
if (event->hw.tp_target) {
- list_del(&event->hw.tp_list);
+ /*
+ * event->parent != NULL means copy_process(), we can avoid
+ * uprobe_apply(). current->mm must be probed and we can rely
+ * on dup_mmap() which preserves the already installed bp's.
+ *
+ * attr.enable_on_exec means that exec/mmap will install the
+ * breakpoints we need.
+ */
done = tu->filter.nr_systemwide ||
- (event->hw.tp_target->flags & PF_EXITING) ||
+ event->parent || event->attr.enable_on_exec ||
uprobe_filter_event(tu, event);
+ list_add(&event->hw.tp_list, &tu->filter.perf_events);
} else {
- tu->filter.nr_systemwide--;
done = tu->filter.nr_systemwide;
+ tu->filter.nr_systemwide++;
}
write_unlock(&tu->filter.rwlock);
- if (!done)
- uprobe_apply(tu->inode, tu->offset, &tu->consumer, false);
-
- return 0;
+ err = 0;
+ if (!done) {
+ err = uprobe_apply(tu->inode, tu->offset, &tu->consumer, true);
+ if (err)
+ uprobe_perf_close(tu, event);
+ }
+ return err;
}
static bool uprobe_perf_filter(struct uprobe_consumer *uc,
--
1.5.5.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-23 16:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-23 16:58 [PATCH 0/1] uprobes/tracing: uprobe_perf_open() forgets to handle the error from uprobe_apply() Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-23 16:58 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2014-04-24 3:17 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Steven Rostedt
2014-04-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] uprobes/tracing: uprobe_perf_open()->uprobe_apply() fix Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-24 11:55 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] uprobes/tracing: Make uprobe_perf_close() visible to uprobe_perf_open() Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-24 11:55 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] uprobes/tracing: Fix uprobe_perf_open() on uprobe_apply() failure Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-24 12:37 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] uprobes/tracing: uprobe_perf_open()->uprobe_apply() fix Steven Rostedt
2014-04-24 9:03 ` [PATCH 1/1] uprobes/tracing: uprobe_perf_open() forgets to handle the error from uprobe_apply() Srikar Dronamraju
2014-04-24 12:27 ` Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140423165830.GA29493@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=aarapov@redhat.com \
--cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
--cc=dave.long@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox