From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757899AbaDWTWg (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Apr 2014 15:22:36 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:36783 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757825AbaDWTWd (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Apr 2014 15:22:33 -0400 Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 15:22:28 -0400 From: Don Zickus To: Andrew Morton Cc: LKML , x86@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, mguzik@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4 V3] Print traces on softlockup Message-ID: <20140423192228.GY8488@redhat.com> References: <1398179848-197479-1-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com> <20140422112828.ea511cefa17affb99d9aa97f@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140422112828.ea511cefa17affb99d9aa97f@linux-foundation.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 11:28:28AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 22 Apr 2014 11:17:24 -0400 Don Zickus wrote: > > > Added more patches to handle the 'uniprocessor' panic case by sending NMIs > > to every cpu but self. Only affects x86, sparc. > > > > Looks OK to me. A couple of things: > > - Patches 1-3 should be combined so we don't create bisection holes > due to x86 and sparc build errors. > > - Patch 4 adds stuff which is unusable on uniprocessor, especially > the presence of /proc/sys/kernel/softlockup_all_cpu_backtrace. We > already have #ifdef CONFIG_SMP in kern_table, so do more of that? Are you suggesting just add CONFIG_SMP to kern_table entry or all the pieces in kernel/watchdog.c too? I wasn't sure how messy I should make this patch. Cheers, Don