From: "Westerberg, Mika" <mika.westerberg@intel.com>
To: Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] pinctrl: add Intel BayTrail GPIO/pinctrl support
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 14:38:22 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140424113822.GF30677@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5358F362.6080006@codeaurora.org>
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 06:20:02AM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
> Westerberg, Mika wrote:
> >Typically this is done by the boot firmware (BIOS in this case). So the OS
> >doesn't need to deal with that.
> >
> >AFAICT ACPI doesn't know anything about pin muxing.
>
> In that case, would it be correct to say that a Linux pinctrl driver
> for an ACPI-only platform should not define pinmux function groups,
> because they'll never be used?
No because you can have a GPIO controller on ACPI machine that allows you
to do some sort of pin muxing. What I'm saying is that ACPI itself doesn't
have such knowledge and hence we don't support such things in
gpiolib-acpi.c.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-24 11:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-18 11:33 [PATCH v3 0/1] Pinctrl/gpio driver for Intel Baytrail platforms Mathias Nyman
2013-06-18 11:33 ` [PATCH v3 1/1] pinctrl: add Intel BayTrail GPIO/pinctrl support Mathias Nyman
2013-06-18 15:17 ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-19 10:28 ` Mathias Nyman
2014-04-11 22:54 ` Timur Tabi
2014-04-14 7:52 ` Mathias Nyman
2014-04-14 15:11 ` Timur Tabi
2014-04-15 10:01 ` Mathias Nyman
2014-04-17 16:47 ` Timur Tabi
2014-04-23 11:46 ` Mathias Nyman
2014-04-23 12:07 ` Timur Tabi
2014-04-23 13:59 ` Westerberg, Mika
2014-04-23 15:14 ` Timur Tabi
2014-04-23 22:20 ` Linus Walleij
2014-04-23 22:54 ` Timur Tabi
2014-04-24 6:27 ` Westerberg, Mika
2014-04-24 11:20 ` Timur Tabi
2014-04-24 11:38 ` Westerberg, Mika [this message]
2014-04-24 6:35 ` Westerberg, Mika
2014-04-24 11:18 ` Timur Tabi
2014-04-24 11:58 ` Westerberg, Mika
2014-04-24 13:29 ` Linus Walleij
2014-04-24 15:25 ` Timur Tabi
2014-04-25 7:41 ` Westerberg, Mika
2014-04-25 10:36 ` Linus Walleij
2014-04-25 16:13 ` Timur Tabi
2014-04-25 16:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-04-25 16:31 ` Timur Tabi
2014-05-02 22:31 ` Linus Walleij
2014-04-23 22:17 ` Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140424113822.GF30677@intel.com \
--to=mika.westerberg@intel.com \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=timur@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).