From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758697AbaDXRdq (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Apr 2014 13:33:46 -0400 Received: from mail-ee0-f48.google.com ([74.125.83.48]:57628 "EHLO mail-ee0-f48.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758534AbaDXRdn (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Apr 2014 13:33:43 -0400 Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 19:33:35 +0200 From: Alexander Aring To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Cc: Alexander Smirnov , Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov , linux-zigbee-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, David Miller , Johannes Berg , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "backports@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [Linux-zigbee-devel] [PATCH] 6lowpan: nuke net_ieee802154_lowpan() accessor when 6lowpan is disabled Message-ID: <20140424173333.GA21799@omega> References: <1398193438-23805-1-git-send-email-mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> <20140424164445.GA4675@omega> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Luis, On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 10:25:58AM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 9:44 AM, Alexander Aring wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 12:03:58PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > >> From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" > >> > >> Johannes noted this is not needed, all of the fragment > >> accessors don't need CONFIG_NET_NS. This goes test compiled with > >> CONFIG_BT_6LOWPAN=y and a disabled CONFIG_NET_NS. > >> > > > > a little note about this here. There exists two 6LoWPAN standard. One > > for bluetooth low energy and one for IEEE 802.15.4. > > > > The actual namespace is only for IEEE 802.15.4, because we need > > fragmentation there. 6LoWPAN fragmentation for bluetooth low energy is > > already handled by the MAC-Layer. So this has nothing to do with > > CONFIG_BT_6LOWPAN. > > Thanks for the clarification, I actually did mean > CONFIG_IEEE802154_6LOWPAN however, I goofed that on the commit log. > ok. But I need to say thanks for sending this patch! :-) It's nice to see that the community helps to improving the code which I produced and it's really not perfect at the moment. (I was a little bit shocked that somebody makes the effort to making a backport about that). - Alex