From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758101AbaDXWQU (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Apr 2014 18:16:20 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:40028 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753655AbaDXWQR (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Apr 2014 18:16:17 -0400 Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 15:19:10 -0700 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Rainer Weikusat Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet , "David S. Miller" Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.4 03/27] net: unix: non blocking recvmsg() should not return -EINTR Message-ID: <20140424221910.GA4098@kroah.com> References: <20140424215551.942390050@linuxfoundation.org> <20140424215552.041408348@linuxfoundation.org> <874n1i8jzh.fsf@sable.mobileactivedefense.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <874n1i8jzh.fsf@sable.mobileactivedefense.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 11:01:54PM +0100, Rainer Weikusat wrote: > Greg Kroah-Hartman writes: > > 3.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me > > know. > > Since this is a machine generated bulk e-mail (as far as I understand > this) which is specifically not intended to be sent to me as person, as > per Eric Dumazet earlier statements, I object to being on the recipient > list without an opportunity to be removed from it as I have repeatedly > requested. Yes, you are right, this is an automated email, based on the changelog comments in the kernel source tree, sorry about that. > Insofar my understanding of European spam legislation goes, this is > illegal. Glad I don't live in Europe :) greg k-h