From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
To: Bastien Armand <armand.bastien@laposte.net>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
Willy Tarreau <willy@meta-x.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Monam Agarwal <monamagarwal123@gmail.com>,
Jake Champlin <jake.champlin.27@gmail.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] staging: panel: fix sparse warnings in lcd_write
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 07:56:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140425055609.GF19929@1wt.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140423173435.GB10879@plop.dartybox.com>
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 07:35:02PM +0200, Bastien Armand wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 01:01:45PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > Btw, this whole function is terrible. It should be reading larger
> > chunks at once instead of get_user() for each character.
Just for the record, very small character counts may be sent to an LCD
panel, in general these are 2 lines of 16 characters, and at most 2x40,
and changes are very rare. The worst case will be if someone displays
the time of day, it will change every second.
> > > + if (lcd_enabled && lcd_initialized) {
> > > + for (; count-- > 0; tmp++) {
> > > + if (!in_interrupt() && (((count + 1) & 0x1f) == 0))
> > > + /* let's be a little nice with other processes
> > > + that need some CPU */
> > > + schedule();
> >
> > This schedule() isn't needed. It just prints a line or two at start up
> > and some other debug output or something. Small small.
> >
>
> I hesitated to remove it. I leave it here as it was allready in lcd_write.
> Perhaps, I could send another patch to remove it.
I believe it can go. I have some memories of it when I was developing the
driver because I didn't know if some LCDs would need long pauses between
each character. Hmmm well, thinking about it after re-reading the code,
we could wait up to 20+40+120 = 180 microseconds when sending one command
(eg: position change), or 20+40+45 = 105 microseconds when sending one
char. That's basically 180+40*105 = 4.185 milliseconds for one full line,
or 8 milliseconds for two lines of 40 chars. So maybe we should keep the
schedule() in the end...
Best regards,
Willy
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-25 5:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-18 16:10 [PATCH v2 2/2] staging: panel: fix sparse warnings in lcd_write Bastien Armand
2014-04-22 10:01 ` Dan Carpenter
2014-04-23 17:35 ` Bastien Armand
2014-04-23 19:21 ` Dan Carpenter
2014-04-25 5:56 ` Willy Tarreau [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140425055609.GF19929@1wt.eu \
--to=w@1wt.eu \
--cc=armand.bastien@laposte.net \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jake.champlin.27@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=monamagarwal123@gmail.com \
--cc=willy@meta-x.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox