From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@linux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, "Jin, Yao" <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Krogerus, Heikki" <heikki.krogerus@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl-baytrail: workaround for irq descriptor conflict on ASUS T100TA
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 12:45:16 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140425094516.GL30677@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1404241617360.28206@ionos.tec.linutronix.de>
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 04:40:25PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Apr 2014, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 9:25 AM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
> >
> > > I'm traveling until friday, so please wait before you commit that
> > > fugly hack. I'll have a closer look how we can handle that at the core
> > > level.
> >
> > Thanks a *lot* Thomas, I'll stand by for action.
>
> Find an untested patch below. It should cure the issue.
>
> I went through all code which can be affected by this and except for
> some other places, which might erroneously allocate inside the
> hardwired space, I can't see any possible fallout.
>
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
>
> -------------------->
>
> Subject: genirq: x86: Ensure that dynamic irq allocation does not conflict
> From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 09:50:53 +0200
>
> On x86 the allocation of irq descriptors may allocate interrupts which
> are in the range of the GSI interrupts. That's wrong as those
> interrupts are hardwired and we don't have the irq domain translation
> like PPC. So one of these interrupts can be hooked up later to one of
> the devices which are hard wired to it and the io_apic init code for
> that particular interrupt line happily reuses that descriptor with a
> completely different configuration so hell breaks lose.
>
> Inside x86 we allocate dynamic interrupts from above nr_gsi_irqs,
> except for a few usage sites which have not yet blown up in our face
> for whatever reason. But for drivers which need an irq range, like the
> GPIO drivers, we have no limit in place and we don't want to expose
> such a detail to a driver.
>
> To cure this introduce a function which an architecture can implement
> to impose a lower bound on the dynamic interrupt allocations.
>
> Implement it for x86 and set the lower bound to nr_gsi_irqs, which is
> the end of the hardwired interrupt space, so all dynamic allocations
> happen above.
>
> That not only allows the GPIO driver to work sanely, it also protects
> the bogus callsites of create_irq_nr() in hpet, uv, irq_remapping and
> htirq code. They need to be cleaned up as well, but that's a separate
> issue.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Works here on my T100,
Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-25 9:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1397443272-31467-1-git-send-email-yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
2014-04-14 2:48 ` [PATCH] pinctrl-baytrail: workaround for irq descriptor conflict on ASUS T100TA Jin, Yao
2014-04-22 13:18 ` Linus Walleij
2014-04-23 2:04 ` Jin, Yao
2014-04-23 11:35 ` Mathias Nyman
2014-04-23 14:28 ` Linus Walleij
2014-04-24 7:25 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-04-24 13:19 ` Linus Walleij
2014-04-24 14:40 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-04-25 9:45 ` Mika Westerberg [this message]
2014-04-28 10:25 ` [tip:irq/urgent] genirq: x86: Ensure that dynamic irq allocation does not conflict tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2014-04-23 15:33 ` [PATCH] pinctrl-baytrail: workaround for irq descriptor conflict on ASUS T100TA Andy Shevchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140425094516.GL30677@intel.com \
--to=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
--cc=heikki.krogerus@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=yao.jin@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).