From: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lenb@kernel.org,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, jiang.liu@linux.intel.com,
vgoyal@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] acpi: try to trust cpu_index from x86_cpu_to_apicid
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 10:19:15 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140428021915.GA1625@dhcp-16-105.nay.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <11963454.DotWb00OAa@vostro.rjw.lan>
On 04/21/14 at 10:51pm, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 15, 2014 07:55:54 AM Baoquan He wrote:
> > In smp with multi cpus, when enter into kdump kernel with only 1 cpu,
> > a warning message is printed out:
> >
> > acpi LNXCPU:0a: BIOS reported wrong ACPI id 0 for the processor
> >
> > In this case kdump kernel use the same ACPI tables as 1st kernel,
> > means lapic information is got from MADT. The acpi_id related to
> > this cpu index and lapic_id may not be 0, so the code to assign
> > value to cpu_index is not correct in this case per cpu0_initialized.
> > cpu index stored in x86_cpu_to_apicid need be respected.
> >
> > Now fix it in this patch per boot_cpu_physical_apicid. When cpu index
> > related to boot_cpu_physical_apicid is not stored in x86_cpu_to_apicid,
> > then we can say this is UP system running SMP kernel with no LAPIC in MADT
>
> Why don't you fix the warning message instead to cover this case too?
>
> > Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
> > index c29c2c3..1ae460c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
> > @@ -267,7 +267,7 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_info(struct acpi_device *device)
> > pr->apic_id = apic_id;
> >
> > cpu_index = acpi_map_cpuid(pr->apic_id, pr->acpi_id);
> > - if (!cpu0_initialized) {
> > + if (!cpu0_initialized && (boot_cpu_physical_apicid == pr->apic_id)) {
Self NACK this patch.
Since this check should be limited on no LAPIC in MADT, so acpi_lapic is
better for this. Will repost after test.
Hi Rafael,
Do you have any suggestion on this fix?
Thanks
Baoquan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-28 2:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-14 23:55 [PATCH] acpi: try to trust cpu_index from x86_cpu_to_apicid Baoquan He
2014-04-21 20:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-04-23 14:40 ` Baoquan He
2014-04-28 2:19 ` Baoquan He [this message]
2014-04-30 5:55 ` [Patch v2] lapic need be checked if available when initialize acpi processor id Baoquan He
2014-04-30 6:03 ` Baoquan He
2014-04-30 20:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-05-02 8:51 ` Baoquan He
2014-05-02 12:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-04-30 20:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140428021915.GA1625@dhcp-16-105.nay.redhat.com \
--to=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=jiang.liu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).