From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
David Long <dave.long@linaro.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] uprobes: Refuse to insert a probe into MAP_SHARED vma
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 21:16:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140428191622.GA9234@redhat.com> (raw)
valid_vma() rejects the VM_SHARED vmas, but this still allows to insert
a probe into the MAP_SHARED but not VM_MAYWRITE vma.
Currently this is fine, such a mapping doesn't really differ from the
private read-only mmap except mprotect(PROT_WRITE) won't work. However,
get_user_pages(FOLL_WRITE | FOLL_FORCE) doesn't allow to COW in this
case, and it would be safer to follow the same conventions as mm even
if currently this happens to work.
After the recent cda540ace6a1 "mm: get_user_pages(write,force) refuse
to COW in shared areas" only uprobes can insert an anon page into the
shared file-backed area, lets stop this and change valid_vma() to check
VM_MAYSHARE instead.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
---
kernel/events/uprobes.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
index d1edc5e..7716c40 100644
--- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
@@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ struct xol_area {
*/
static bool valid_vma(struct vm_area_struct *vma, bool is_register)
{
- vm_flags_t flags = VM_HUGETLB | VM_MAYEXEC | VM_SHARED;
+ vm_flags_t flags = VM_HUGETLB | VM_MAYEXEC | VM_MAYSHARE;
if (is_register)
flags |= VM_WRITE;
--
1.5.5.1
next reply other threads:[~2014-04-28 19:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-28 19:16 Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2014-04-28 19:30 ` [PATCH] uprobes: Refuse to insert a probe into MAP_SHARED vma Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140428191622.GA9234@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
--cc=dave.long@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).