public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Marian Marinov <mm@1h.com>
Cc: containers@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	LXC development mailing-list 
	<lxc-devel@lists.linuxcontainers.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ioctl CAP_LINUX_IMMUTABLE is checked in the wrong namespace
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 14:35:34 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140429183534.GB19325@thunk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <535FADDA.2070803@1h.com>

On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 04:49:14PM +0300, Marian Marinov wrote:
> 
> I'm proposing a fix to this, by replacing the capable(CAP_LINUX_IMMUTABLE)
> check with ns_capable(current_cred()->user_ns, CAP_LINUX_IMMUTABLE).

Um, wouldn't it be better to simply fix the capable() function?

/**
 * capable - Determine if the current task has a superior capability in effect
 * @cap: The capability to be tested for
 *
 * Return true if the current task has the given superior capability currently
 * available for use, false if not.
 *
 * This sets PF_SUPERPRIV on the task if the capability is available on the
 * assumption that it's about to be used.
 */
bool capable(int cap)
{
	return ns_capable(&init_user_ns, cap);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(capable);

The documentation states that it is for "the current task", and I
can't imagine any use case, where user namespaces are in effect, where
using init_user_ns would ever make sense.

No?  Otherwise, pretty much every single use of capable() would be
broken, not just this once instances in ext4/ioctl.c.

					- Ted

  reply	other threads:[~2014-04-29 18:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-29 13:49 ioctl CAP_LINUX_IMMUTABLE is checked in the wrong namespace Marian Marinov
2014-04-29 18:35 ` Theodore Ts'o [this message]
2014-04-29 18:52   ` Serge Hallyn
2014-04-29 21:49     ` Marian Marinov
2014-04-29 22:02       ` Serge Hallyn
2014-04-29 22:24         ` Marian Marinov
2014-04-29 22:29           ` Serge Hallyn
2014-04-29 22:45             ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-04-29 23:06               ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-04-29 23:07                 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-04-29 23:20               ` Marian Marinov
2014-04-29 23:22                 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-04-29 23:47                   ` Stéphane Graber
2014-04-29 23:51                     ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-04-30  0:01                       ` Stéphane Graber
2014-04-30  0:10                         ` Marian Marinov
2014-04-30  0:12                           ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-04-30  0:11                         ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-04-30  0:21                           ` Serge Hallyn
2014-04-30  0:23                             ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-04-30  0:44                               ` Serge Hallyn
2014-04-30  1:03                                 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-04-30  0:16               ` Serge Hallyn
2014-04-30  0:32                 ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-04-30  0:33                   ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-04-30  0:40                   ` Serge Hallyn
2014-04-30  7:48                   ` Eric W. Biederman
2014-04-30 13:33                     ` Serge Hallyn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140429183534.GB19325@thunk.org \
    --to=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lxc-devel@lists.linuxcontainers.org \
    --cc=mm@1h.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox