From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Marian Marinov <mm@1h.com>
Cc: containers@lists.linux-foundation.org,
LXC development mailing-list
<lxc-devel@lists.linuxcontainers.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ioctl CAP_LINUX_IMMUTABLE is checked in the wrong namespace
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 14:35:34 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140429183534.GB19325@thunk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <535FADDA.2070803@1h.com>
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 04:49:14PM +0300, Marian Marinov wrote:
>
> I'm proposing a fix to this, by replacing the capable(CAP_LINUX_IMMUTABLE)
> check with ns_capable(current_cred()->user_ns, CAP_LINUX_IMMUTABLE).
Um, wouldn't it be better to simply fix the capable() function?
/**
* capable - Determine if the current task has a superior capability in effect
* @cap: The capability to be tested for
*
* Return true if the current task has the given superior capability currently
* available for use, false if not.
*
* This sets PF_SUPERPRIV on the task if the capability is available on the
* assumption that it's about to be used.
*/
bool capable(int cap)
{
return ns_capable(&init_user_ns, cap);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(capable);
The documentation states that it is for "the current task", and I
can't imagine any use case, where user namespaces are in effect, where
using init_user_ns would ever make sense.
No? Otherwise, pretty much every single use of capable() would be
broken, not just this once instances in ext4/ioctl.c.
- Ted
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-29 18:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-29 13:49 ioctl CAP_LINUX_IMMUTABLE is checked in the wrong namespace Marian Marinov
2014-04-29 18:35 ` Theodore Ts'o [this message]
2014-04-29 18:52 ` Serge Hallyn
2014-04-29 21:49 ` Marian Marinov
2014-04-29 22:02 ` Serge Hallyn
2014-04-29 22:24 ` Marian Marinov
2014-04-29 22:29 ` Serge Hallyn
2014-04-29 22:45 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-04-29 23:06 ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-04-29 23:07 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-04-29 23:20 ` Marian Marinov
2014-04-29 23:22 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-04-29 23:47 ` Stéphane Graber
2014-04-29 23:51 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-04-30 0:01 ` Stéphane Graber
2014-04-30 0:10 ` Marian Marinov
2014-04-30 0:12 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-04-30 0:11 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-04-30 0:21 ` Serge Hallyn
2014-04-30 0:23 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-04-30 0:44 ` Serge Hallyn
2014-04-30 1:03 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-04-30 0:16 ` Serge Hallyn
2014-04-30 0:32 ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-04-30 0:33 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-04-30 0:40 ` Serge Hallyn
2014-04-30 7:48 ` Eric W. Biederman
2014-04-30 13:33 ` Serge Hallyn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140429183534.GB19325@thunk.org \
--to=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lxc-devel@lists.linuxcontainers.org \
--cc=mm@1h.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox