public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>,
	Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-aio@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] aio: change exit_aio() to load mm->ioctx_table once and avoid rcu_read_lock()
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 11:23:44 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140430152344.GD28959@kvack.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140430141616.GB18539@redhat.com>

Hi Oleg,

On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 04:16:16PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> 1. We can read ->ioctx_table only once and we do not read rcu_read_lock()
>    or even rcu_dereference().
> 
>    This mm has no users, nobody else can play with ->ioctx_table. Otherwise
>    the code is buggy anyway, if we need rcu_read_lock() in a loop because
>    ->ioctx_table can be updated then kfree(table) is obviously wrong.
> 
> 2. Update the comment. "exit_mmap(mm) is coming" is the good reason to avoid
>    munmap(), but another reason is that we simply can't do vm_munmap() unless
>    current->mm == mm and this is not true in general, the caller is mmput().
> 
> 3. We do not really need to nullify mm->ioctx_table before return, probably
>    the current code does this to catch the potential problems. But in this
>    case RCU_INIT_POINTER(NULL) looks better.

Looks pretty good.  One minor style comment below.

> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
> ---
>  fs/aio.c |   47 ++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------
>  1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/aio.c b/fs/aio.c
> index 79b7e69..3526c2b 100644
> --- a/fs/aio.c
> +++ b/fs/aio.c
> @@ -791,40 +791,29 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(wait_on_sync_kiocb);
>   */
>  void exit_aio(struct mm_struct *mm)
>  {
> -	struct kioctx_table *table;
> -	struct kioctx *ctx;
> -	unsigned i = 0;
> -
> -	while (1) {
> -		rcu_read_lock();
> -		table = rcu_dereference(mm->ioctx_table);
> -
> -		do {
> -			if (!table || i >= table->nr) {
> -				rcu_read_unlock();
> -				rcu_assign_pointer(mm->ioctx_table, NULL);
> -				if (table)
> -					kfree(table);
> -				return;
> -			}
> -
> -			ctx = table->table[i++];
> -		} while (!ctx);
> +	struct kioctx_table *table = rcu_dereference_raw(mm->ioctx_table);
> +	int i;
>  
> -		rcu_read_unlock();
> +	if (!table)
> +		return;
>  
> +	for (i = 0; i < table->nr; ++i) {
> +		struct kioctx *ctx = table->table[i];
>  		/*
> -		 * We don't need to bother with munmap() here -
> -		 * exit_mmap(mm) is coming and it'll unmap everything.
> -		 * Since aio_free_ring() uses non-zero ->mmap_size
> -		 * as indicator that it needs to unmap the area,
> -		 * just set it to 0; aio_free_ring() is the only
> -		 * place that uses ->mmap_size, so it's safe.
> +		 * We don't need to bother with munmap() here - exit_mmap(mm)
> +		 * is coming and it'll unmap everything. And we simply can't,
> +		 * this is not necessarily our ->mm.
> +		 * Since kill_ioctx() uses non-zero ->mmap_size as indicator
> +		 * that it needs to unmap the area, just set it to 0.
>  		 */
> -		ctx->mmap_size = 0;
> -
> -		kill_ioctx(mm, ctx, NULL);
> +		if (ctx) {
> +			ctx->mmap_size = 0;
> +			kill_ioctx(mm, ctx, NULL);
> +		}

Rather than indenting and moving the two lines changing mmap_size and the 
kill_ioctx() call, why not just do "if (!ctx) ... continue;"?  That reduces 
the number of lines changed and avoid excessive indentation.

		-ben

>  	}
> +
> +	RCU_INIT_POINTER(mm->ioctx_table, NULL);
> +	kfree(table);
>  }
>  
>  static void put_reqs_available(struct kioctx *ctx, unsigned nr)
> -- 
> 1.5.5.1
> 

-- 
"Thought is the essence of where you are now."

  reply	other threads:[~2014-04-30 15:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-29 18:39 [PATCH 0/1] aio: change exit_aio() to load mm->ioctx_table once and avoid rcu_read_lock() Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-29 18:39 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-29 23:36   ` Kent Overstreet
2014-04-29 18:40 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-29 20:42   ` Benjamin LaHaise
2014-04-29 21:22     ` Benjamin LaHaise
2014-04-29 23:04       ` Mateusz Guzik
2014-04-30 12:13         ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-30 14:15       ` [PATCH v2 0/2] aio: ioctx_table/rcu_read_lock cleanups Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-30 14:16         ` [PATCH v2 1/2] aio: change exit_aio() to load mm->ioctx_table once and avoid rcu_read_lock() Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-30 15:23           ` Benjamin LaHaise [this message]
2014-04-30 17:02             ` [PATCH v3 " Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-30 14:16         ` [PATCH v2 2/2] aio: kill the misleading rcu read locks in ioctx_add_table() and kill_ioctx() Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-29 19:33 ` [PATCH 0/1] aio: change exit_aio() to load mm->ioctx_table once and avoid rcu_read_lock() Benjamin LaHaise
2014-04-29 19:49   ` Oleg Nesterov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140430152344.GD28959@kvack.org \
    --to=bcrl@kvack.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=kmo@daterainc.com \
    --cc=linux-aio@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox