From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753543AbaEAHnG (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 1 May 2014 03:43:06 -0400
Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:39436 "EHLO
	casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752099AbaEAHnE (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 1 May 2014 03:43:04 -0400
Date: Thu, 1 May 2014 09:42:57 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
        Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>, dm-devel@redhat.com,
        Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>, Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>,
        Steve French <sfrench@samba.org>, "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
        Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SCHED: remove proliferation of wait_on_bit action
 functions.
Message-ID: <20140501074257.GK11096@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <20140501123738.3e64b2d2@notabene.brown>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20140501123738.3e64b2d2@notabene.brown>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2012-12-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 12:37:38PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
> +static inline int
> +wait_on_bit(void *word, int bit, unsigned mode)
> +{
> +	if (!test_bit(bit, word))
> +		return 0;
> +	return out_of_line_wait_on_bit(word, bit,
> +				       bit_wait,
> +				       mode & 65535);
> +}

Still puzzled by the 16 bit mask there ;-)