From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752934AbaEBQvM (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 May 2014 12:51:12 -0400 Received: from cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com ([217.140.96.50]:45955 "EHLO cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751805AbaEBQvI (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 May 2014 12:51:08 -0400 Date: Fri, 2 May 2014 17:51:05 +0100 From: Will Deacon To: Jean Pihet Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Ingo Molnar , Jiri Olsa , Patch Tracking , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Steve Capper , Corey Ashford , Frederic Weisbecker , Namhyung Kim , Paul Mackerras , Peter Zijlstra , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , David Ahern , Mark Rutland Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] perf tests: Introduce perf_regs_load function on ARM64 Message-ID: <20140502165105.GD20642@arm.com> References: <1398690730-5454-1-git-send-email-jean.pihet@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 10:19:38AM +0100, Jean Pihet wrote: > Hi WIll, Mark, > > Ping on this series. Can you please check? Is the refreshed patch OK? Fine by me, as long as it's not reused outside of this test :) Will