public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@iguana.be>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Jonas Jensen <jonas.jensen@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/5] watchdog: Add API to trigger reboots
Date: Sun, 4 May 2014 23:27:26 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140505042726.GF11606@lukather> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140503042925.GB5882@roeck-us.net>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1909 bytes --]

On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 09:29:25PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > +	if (wdd->ops->reboot)
> > > +		wdd_reboot_dev = wdd;
> > > +
> > 
> > Overall, it looks really great, but I guess we can make it a
> > list. Otherwise, we might end up in a situation where we could not
> > reboot anymore, like this one for example:
> >   - a first watchdog is probed, registers a reboot function
> >   - a second watchdog is probed, registers a reboot function that
> >     overwrites the first one.
> >   - then, the second watchdog disappears for some reason, and the
> >     reboot is set to NULL
> > 
> I thought about that, but how likely (or unlikely) is that to ever happen ?
> So I figured it is not worth the effort, and would just add complexity without
> real gain. We could always add the list later if we ever encounter a situation
> where two watchdogs in the same system provide a reboot callback.

The A31 we were discussing about in the other thread that doesn't have
a watchdog driver yet has four, identical, watchogs. I'm not really
concerned about the mentionned issue, since they will never be
removed, but the situation might happen with an on-SoC watchdog and an
i2c one (if that even exists).

But yes, right, that can be postponed.

> > Or maybe we can just use the start callback, with the min timeout already
> > registered, and prevent the user to kick the watchdog.
> > 
> Doesn't always work, unfortunately, even now. The moxart driver causes 
> an explicit and immediate reset. Also, some watchdogs don't reset the system
> directly but get an interrupt, which then calls the reset handler. Which,
> in our case, would call the start callback again, and you would have an endless
> loop.

Ok. You have my Acked-by then.

Thanks!
Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2014-05-05  4:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-05-01 15:41 [RFC PATCH 0/5] watchdog: Add reboot API Guenter Roeck
2014-05-01 15:41 ` [RFC PATCH 1/5] watchdog: Add API to trigger reboots Guenter Roeck
2014-05-02 10:01   ` Will Deacon
2014-05-02 13:22     ` Guenter Roeck
2014-05-03  1:22   ` Maxime Ripard
2014-05-03  4:29     ` Guenter Roeck
2014-05-05  4:27       ` Maxime Ripard [this message]
2014-05-07 11:52       ` Lucas Stach
2014-05-07 13:01         ` Guenter Roeck
2014-05-07 15:49           ` Lucas Stach
2014-05-07 19:15           ` Maxime Ripard
2014-05-05 18:36   ` Felipe Balbi
2014-05-05 19:45     ` Guenter Roeck
2014-05-01 15:41 ` [RFC PATCH 2/5] arm64: Support reboot through watchdog subsystem Guenter Roeck
2014-05-01 15:41 ` [RFC PATCH 3/5] arm: " Guenter Roeck
2014-05-01 15:41 ` [RFC PATCH 4/5] watchdog: moxart: Register reboot handler with " Guenter Roeck
2014-05-01 15:41 ` [RFC PATCH 5/5] watchdog: sunxi: " Guenter Roeck
2014-05-05 18:26 ` [RFC PATCH 0/5] watchdog: Add reboot API Arnd Bergmann
2014-05-06 14:29 ` Jonas Jensen
2014-05-07 11:01 ` Heiko Stübner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140505042726.GF11606@lukather \
    --to=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=jonas.jensen@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=wim@iguana.be \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox