From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com,
paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
khilman@linaro.org, tglx@linutronix.de, axboe@fb.com,
linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:timers/nohz] nohz: Move full nohz kick to its own IPI
Date: Mon, 5 May 2014 17:06:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140505150558.GC2099@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140505145815.GQ26782@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 04:58:15PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 04:52:59PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > > Should we instead do irq_work_queue_on() ?
> >
> > I would really much prefer that yeah. But if we do that, expect some added overhead on the local
> > irq_work_queue() path though. irq_work_raise can't use local cmpxchg ops anymore.
> >
> > Or we can have a different pending raise system for remote irq work.
> >
> > I can try something.
>
> Loosing that local cmpxchg shouldn't be a problem, I don't thnk this is
> a particularly hot path.
Then the conversion is easy since most of the irq work code should
already work for remote queuing.
I'll come up with a patch soon.
Thanks.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-05 15:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <tip-72aacf0259bb7d53b7a3b5b2f7bf982acaa52b61@git.kernel.org>
2014-05-05 12:37 ` [tip:timers/nohz] nohz: Move full nohz kick to its own IPI Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-05 13:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-05 15:04 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-05-05 15:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-05 15:34 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-05-07 15:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-07 15:29 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-05-07 15:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-07 16:05 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-05-07 16:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-07 19:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2014-05-09 15:10 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-05-11 5:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2014-05-05 14:52 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-05-05 14:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-05 15:06 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140505150558.GC2099@localhost.localdomain \
--to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=khilman@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox