From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Mathieu Souchaud <mattieu.souchaud@free.fr>,
"bp@alien8.de" <bp@alien8.de>,
"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"hpa@zytor.com" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
"linux-edac@vger.kernel.org" <linux-edac@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org"
<kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/mce: Improve mcheck_init_device() error handling
Date: Tue, 6 May 2014 08:27:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140506062710.GB25208@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F327F8E9B@ORSMSX114.amr.corp.intel.com>
* Luck, Tony <tony.luck@intel.com> wrote:
> +err_device_create:
> + /*
> + * mce_device_remove behave properly if mce_device_create was not
> + * called on that device.
> + */
> + for_each_possible_cpu(i)
> + mce_device_remove(i);
>
> grammar comment "s/behave/behaves/"
>
> Though perhaps this is better:
>
> /*
> * We didn't keep track of which devices were created above, but
> * even if we had, the set of online cpus might have changed.
> * Play safe and remove for every possible cpu since mce_device_remove()
> * will do the right thing.
> */
and I guess:
s/cpu since/cpu, since/
?
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-06 6:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-03 21:03 [PATCH v2] x86/mce: Improve mcheck_init_device() error handling Mathieu Souchaud
2014-05-03 21:25 ` mathieu souchaud
2014-05-05 23:29 ` Luck, Tony
2014-05-06 6:27 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2014-05-07 9:33 ` mattieu.souchaud
2014-05-22 9:53 ` Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140506062710.GB25208@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mattieu.souchaud@free.fr \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox