public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Gleb Natapov <gleb@kernel.org>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [ABOMINATION] x86: Fast interrupt return to userspace
Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 13:14:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140507111422.GA8410@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrVHj1rd=ma-dW8C9RNyQNj3smRAyevWJSQXmvgshbQb6w@mail.gmail.com>


* Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> wrote:

> > Whatever. I got enough profile data to say that it seems to have 
> > cut 'iret' overhead by at least two thirds. So it may not *work*, 
> > but from a "hey look, some random numbers" standpoint it is worth 
> > playing with.
> 
> :)
> 
> Is there actual interest in turning something like this into a real 
> patch?  It would almost certainly have to default off and no one 
> sane would ever use it except for special-purpose machines.

The macro speedup looks rather impressive, and we've done ugly things 
for far smaller speedups.

But I don't think it should be a 'special mode'. It either is made to 
work unconditionally and can be a prime speedup to be proud of in a 
politely disgusted fashion, or we don't want the complexity (and 
future bitrot) of some special switch.

At minimum it can be a "look we want this speedup in hardware" 
testcase to CPU designers.

Thanks,

	Ingo

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-05-07 11:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-05-06 20:29 [ABOMINATION] x86: Fast interrupt return to userspace Andy Lutomirski
2014-05-06 20:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-05-06 21:00   ` Linus Torvalds
2014-05-06 21:25     ` Linus Torvalds
2014-05-06 21:34       ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-05-06 21:48         ` Linus Torvalds
2014-05-06 22:49           ` Steven Rostedt
2014-05-06 23:37             ` Måns Rullgård
2014-05-07 11:14         ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2014-05-07 15:27           ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-05-06 21:40       ` Linus Torvalds

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140507111422.GA8410@gmail.com \
    --to=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=gleb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox