From: Robert Richter <rric@kernel.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@linaro.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/16] perf, persistent: Add persistent events
Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 19:01:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140507170155.GH32718@rric.localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140506185826.GF25013@pd.tnic>
On 06.05.14 20:58:26, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 02:39:07PM +0200, Robert Richter wrote:
> > I rather would change the ioctl to
> >
> > id = ioctl(PERF_EVENT_IOC_SET_PERSIST, arg);
> >
> > arg != 0: create persistent event (unclaim)
> > arg == 0: delete persistent event (claim)
> >
> > This has the advantage that the naming is better and arg can be used
> > as parameter (e.g. event id to share a namespace).
>
> Yep, this is better than the CLAIM/UNCLAIM thing.
Yeah, I am wondering why we didn't get this earlier. ;)
> > The unclaim ioctl *creates* a buffer with 512kB default size. The
> > reopening process must mmap with the same buffer size. This is a
> > problem as in this implementation the buffer size is fix and can not
> > be adjusted.
>
> Why do we need it to be adjustable?
I am fine with a fixed size. But this design might not be changable in
the future without breaking the API. So its worth to think about this.
Maybe we allow the process also to create the buffer, there are 2
variants then:
perf_event_open(...);
mmap(..., fd, ...);
ioctl(fd, set_persistent, 1); /* Use existing buffer. */
close();
fd = perf_event_open(...);
ioctl(fd, set_persistent, 1); /* Create buffer with default size. */
close();
This would solve the problem how we adjust buffer size.
This requires a way to detect buffer size. See my mail how this could
be done.
>
> > We could let create the process the buffers and make the
> > event persistent including the current buffers.
> >
> > Variable buffer size is a must,
>
> Yeah, why? I'm just asking for my own understanding.
For general-purpose... Why 512k buffers are ok? Depending on the
event, smaller buffers are maybe good enough, esp. since they are
permanently enabled and use system resources. Or, at some point, 512k
is not sufficient anymore. You don't want 512k be carved in stone.
> > so the reopening process also must be
> > able to detect buffer size. Mmap buffer size could be detected by
> > mmap'ing only the header page, reading the buffer size from the header
> > and then remapping the buffer with adjusted size.
> >
> > It would be good to have a perf tool option -P that puts events in
> > persistent state instead of starting a command:
> >
> > # perf record -e ... -a -P <namespace> # create pers. events
> > # perf record -e persistent/<namespace>/ -a # read existing buffers
> > # perf record -e persistent/<namespace>/ -a -k # read and kill existing events
> >
> > Note that no args for a command are given.
>
> Yep, looks sane to me.
Ok.
Thanks for your commments.
-Robert
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-07 17:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-07 15:04 [PATCH v4 00/16] perf, persistent: Add persistent events Jean Pihet
2014-04-07 15:04 ` [PATCH 01/16] perf, mmap: Factor out ring_buffer_detach_all() Jean Pihet
2014-04-07 15:04 ` [PATCH 02/16] perf, mmap: Factor out try_get_event()/put_event() Jean Pihet
2014-04-07 15:04 ` [PATCH 03/16] perf, mmap: Factor out perf_alloc/free_rb() Jean Pihet
2014-04-22 14:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-07 15:04 ` [PATCH 04/16] perf, mmap: Factor out perf_get_fd() Jean Pihet
2014-04-22 14:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-25 13:54 ` Robert Richter
2014-04-25 14:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-25 14:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-29 15:34 ` Robert Richter
2014-04-07 15:04 ` [PATCH 05/16] perf: Add persistent events Jean Pihet
2014-04-07 15:04 ` [PATCH 06/16] mce, x86: Enable " Jean Pihet
2014-04-07 15:04 ` [PATCH 07/16] perf, persistent: Implementing a persistent pmu Jean Pihet
2014-04-07 15:04 ` [PATCH 08/16] perf, persistent: Exposing persistent events using sysfs Jean Pihet
2014-04-07 15:04 ` [PATCH 09/16] perf, persistent: Use unique event ids Jean Pihet
2014-04-07 15:04 ` [PATCH 10/16] perf, persistent: Implement reference counter for events Jean Pihet
2014-04-07 15:04 ` [PATCH 11/16] perf, persistent: Dynamically resize list of sysfs entries Jean Pihet
2014-04-07 15:04 ` [PATCH 12/16] perf, persistent: ioctl functions to control persistency Jean Pihet
2014-04-07 15:04 ` [PATCH 13/16] perf tools: Rename flex conditions to avoid name conflicts Jean Pihet
2014-04-07 15:04 ` [PATCH 14/16] perf tools: Modify event parser to update event attribute by index Jean Pihet
2014-04-07 15:04 ` [PATCH 15/16] perf tools: Add attr<num> syntax to event parser Jean Pihet
2014-04-07 15:04 ` [PATCH 16/16] perf tools: Retry mapping buffers readonly on EACCES Jean Pihet
2014-04-17 12:44 ` [PATCH v4 00/16] perf, persistent: Add persistent events Jean Pihet
2014-04-17 12:50 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-04-17 13:17 ` Jean Pihet
2014-04-17 13:21 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-04-22 8:20 ` Jean Pihet
2014-04-22 10:07 ` Jean Pihet
2014-04-22 10:20 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-05-06 12:39 ` Robert Richter
2014-05-06 18:50 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-05-06 18:53 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-05-07 16:44 ` Robert Richter
2014-05-08 18:23 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-05-09 9:17 ` Robert Richter
2014-05-06 18:58 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-05-07 17:01 ` Robert Richter [this message]
2014-05-08 18:36 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-05-09 8:52 ` Robert Richter
2014-05-09 10:17 ` Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140507170155.GH32718@rric.localhost \
--to=rric@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@infradead.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=jean.pihet@linaro.org \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox