[GIT PULL] xfs: fixes for 3.15-rc5

[GIT PULL] xfs: fixes for 3.15-rc5

[Dave Chinner]

Hi Linus,

Can you please pull the updates listed below? The main fix is adding
support for default ACLs on O_TMPFILE opened inodes to bring XFS into
line with other filesystems. Metadata CRCs are now also considered
well enough tested to be fully supported, so we're removing the
shouty warnings issued at mount time for filesystems with that
format. And there's transaction block reservation overrun fix.

BTW, will GPG signing these pull requests cause you problems? I've
been signing everything "official" I send as the XFS maintainer
(e.g. notifications of tree updates) and I figured that pull
requests are about as "official" as it gets. The tag is signed, so
I'm not particularly worried either way...

-Dave.

The following changes since commit 330033d697ed8d296fa52b5303db9d802ad901cc:

  xfs: fix tmpfile/selinux deadlock and initialize security (2014-04-17 08:15:30 +1000)

are available in the git repository at:

  git://oss.sgi.com/xfs/xfs.git xfs-fixes-for-3.15-rc5

for you to fetch changes up to 8275cdd0e7ac550dcce2b3ef6d2fb3b808c1ae59:

  xfs: remote attribute overwrite causes transaction overrun (2014-05-06 07:37:31 +1000)

----------------------------------------------------------------
Fixes for 3.15-rc5:
- fix a remote attribute size calculation bug that leads to a
  transaction overrun
- add default ACLs to O_TMPFILE files
- Remove the EXPERIMENTAL tag from filesystems with metadata CRC
  support

----------------------------------------------------------------
Brian Foster (1):
      xfs: initialize default acls for ->tmpfile()

Dave Chinner (2):
      xfs: fully support v5 format filesystems
      xfs: remote attribute overwrite causes transaction overrun

 fs/xfs/xfs_attr.c        |   24 +++++++++++++++++++-
 fs/xfs/xfs_attr_leaf.c   |   21 +++++++++---------
 fs/xfs/xfs_attr_list.c   |    1 +
 fs/xfs/xfs_attr_remote.c |    8 ++++---
 fs/xfs/xfs_da_btree.h    |    2 ++
 fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c        |   55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
 fs/xfs/xfs_log.c         |   10 +++++----
 fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c       |    2 --
 fs/xfs/xfs_sb.c          |    4 ----
 9 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

Re: [GIT PULL] xfs: fixes for 3.15-rc5

[Linus Torvalds]

On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 2:12 PM, Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> wrote:
>
> BTW, will GPG signing these pull requests cause you problems?

Nope. But I won't be checking email signatures. GPG email signing is
so badly done that afaik only one or two email clients support it.

> I've
> been signing everything "official" I send as the XFS maintainer
> (e.g. notifications of tree updates) and I figured that pull
> requests are about as "official" as it gets. The tag is signed, so
> I'm not particularly worried either way...

.. what tag? You point me at

>   git://oss.sgi.com/xfs/xfs.git xfs-fixes-for-3.15-rc5

and that is definitely not a tag.

Did you *mean* to point me at refs/tags/xfs-for-linus-3.15-rc5, perhaps?

I've not pulled due to the ambiguity of the pull request.

           Linus

Re: [GIT PULL] xfs: fixes for 3.15-rc5

[Dave Chinner]

On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 04:13:00PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 2:12 PM, Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> wrote:
> >
> > BTW, will GPG signing these pull requests cause you problems?
> 
> Nope. But I won't be checking email signatures. GPG email signing is
> so badly done that afaik only one or two email clients support it.
> 
> > I've
> > been signing everything "official" I send as the XFS maintainer
> > (e.g. notifications of tree updates) and I figured that pull
> > requests are about as "official" as it gets. The tag is signed, so
> > I'm not particularly worried either way...
> 
> .. what tag? You point me at
> 
> >   git://oss.sgi.com/xfs/xfs.git xfs-fixes-for-3.15-rc5
> 
> and that is definitely not a tag.

Hmmm, I didn't notice the output of the pull request command I ran
converted the tag to a branch. Checking my command history, it looks
like I ran request-pull before I pushed the tag. Sure be nice to get
a "tag doesn't exist upstream" error, but I'll make sure I don't do
that again.

> Did you *mean* to point me at refs/tags/xfs-for-linus-3.15-rc5, perhaps?

Yup, updated request below.

-Dave.

The following changes since commit 330033d697ed8d296fa52b5303db9d802ad901cc:

  xfs: fix tmpfile/selinux deadlock and initialize security (2014-04-17 08:15:30 +1000)

are available in the git repository at:

  git://oss.sgi.com/xfs/xfs.git tags/xfs-for-linus-3.15-rc5

for you to fetch changes up to 8275cdd0e7ac550dcce2b3ef6d2fb3b808c1ae59:

  xfs: remote attribute overwrite causes transaction overrun (2014-05-06 07:37:31 +1000)

----------------------------------------------------------------
Fixes for 3.15-rc5:
- fix a remote attribute size calculation bug that leads to a
  transaction overrun
- add default ACLs to O_TMPFILE files
- Remove the EXPERIMENTAL tag from filesystems with metadata CRC
  support

----------------------------------------------------------------
Brian Foster (1):
      xfs: initialize default acls for ->tmpfile()

Dave Chinner (2):
      xfs: fully support v5 format filesystems
      xfs: remote attribute overwrite causes transaction overrun

 fs/xfs/xfs_attr.c        |   24 +++++++++++++++++++-
 fs/xfs/xfs_attr_leaf.c   |   21 +++++++++---------
 fs/xfs/xfs_attr_list.c   |    1 +
 fs/xfs/xfs_attr_remote.c |    8 ++++---
 fs/xfs/xfs_da_btree.h    |    2 ++
 fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c        |   55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
 fs/xfs/xfs_log.c         |   10 +++++----
 fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c       |    2 --
 fs/xfs/xfs_sb.c          |    4 ----
 9 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com