From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755134AbaEIArN (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 May 2014 20:47:13 -0400 Received: from ipmail06.adl2.internode.on.net ([150.101.137.129]:9991 "EHLO ipmail06.adl2.internode.on.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753455AbaEIArM (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 May 2014 20:47:12 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ArRSANkkbFN5LL1sPGdsb2JhbABZgwZPh3ikJQEBAQEBAQaaFQGBEhcDAQEBATg1giUBAQQBJxMcIwULCAMYCSUPBSUDBxoTiDkH0G4XFoVAiBoRAVAHhD8EhUmTbpZEK4E5 Date: Fri, 9 May 2014 10:47:08 +1000 From: Dave Chinner To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List , xfs@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] xfs: fixes for 3.15-rc5 Message-ID: <20140509004708.GH26353@dastard> References: <20140508211217.GC26353@dastard> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 04:13:00PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 2:12 PM, Dave Chinner wrote: > > > > BTW, will GPG signing these pull requests cause you problems? > > Nope. But I won't be checking email signatures. GPG email signing is > so badly done that afaik only one or two email clients support it. > > > I've > > been signing everything "official" I send as the XFS maintainer > > (e.g. notifications of tree updates) and I figured that pull > > requests are about as "official" as it gets. The tag is signed, so > > I'm not particularly worried either way... > > .. what tag? You point me at > > > git://oss.sgi.com/xfs/xfs.git xfs-fixes-for-3.15-rc5 > > and that is definitely not a tag. Hmmm, I didn't notice the output of the pull request command I ran converted the tag to a branch. Checking my command history, it looks like I ran request-pull before I pushed the tag. Sure be nice to get a "tag doesn't exist upstream" error, but I'll make sure I don't do that again. > Did you *mean* to point me at refs/tags/xfs-for-linus-3.15-rc5, perhaps? Yup, updated request below. -Dave. The following changes since commit 330033d697ed8d296fa52b5303db9d802ad901cc: xfs: fix tmpfile/selinux deadlock and initialize security (2014-04-17 08:15:30 +1000) are available in the git repository at: git://oss.sgi.com/xfs/xfs.git tags/xfs-for-linus-3.15-rc5 for you to fetch changes up to 8275cdd0e7ac550dcce2b3ef6d2fb3b808c1ae59: xfs: remote attribute overwrite causes transaction overrun (2014-05-06 07:37:31 +1000) ---------------------------------------------------------------- Fixes for 3.15-rc5: - fix a remote attribute size calculation bug that leads to a transaction overrun - add default ACLs to O_TMPFILE files - Remove the EXPERIMENTAL tag from filesystems with metadata CRC support ---------------------------------------------------------------- Brian Foster (1): xfs: initialize default acls for ->tmpfile() Dave Chinner (2): xfs: fully support v5 format filesystems xfs: remote attribute overwrite causes transaction overrun fs/xfs/xfs_attr.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++- fs/xfs/xfs_attr_leaf.c | 21 +++++++++--------- fs/xfs/xfs_attr_list.c | 1 + fs/xfs/xfs_attr_remote.c | 8 ++++--- fs/xfs/xfs_da_btree.h | 2 ++ fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------- fs/xfs/xfs_log.c | 10 +++++---- fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c | 2 -- fs/xfs/xfs_sb.c | 4 ---- 9 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-) -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com