public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: riel@redhat.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org, mgorman@suse.de,
	chegu_vinod@hp.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] sched,numa: weigh nearby nodes for task placement on complex NUMA topologies
Date: Fri, 9 May 2014 11:53:24 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140509095324.GQ30445@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1399569811-14362-3-git-send-email-riel@redhat.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 678 bytes --]

On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 01:23:29PM -0400, riel@redhat.com wrote:
> +		/*
> +		 * For nodes with distances in-between LOCAL_DISTANCE
> +		 * and max_distance, we count the faults on those nodes
> +		 * in proportion to their distance, using this formula:
> +		 *
> +		 * max_distance - node_distance
> +		 * -----------------------------
> +		 * max_distance - LOCAL_DISTANCE
> +		 */
> +		if (task)
> +			faults = task_faults(p, node);
> +		else
> +			faults = group_faults(p, node);
> +
> +		score += 1000 * faults *
> +				(max_distance - distance) /
> +				(max_distance - LOCAL_DISTANCE);

OK that makes sense, except I would suggest you use a power-of-two scale
factor :-)

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2014-05-09  9:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-05-08 17:23 [PATCH 0/4] sched,numa: task placement for complex NUMA topologies riel
2014-05-08 17:23 ` [PATCH 1/4] numa,x86: store maximum numa node distance riel
2014-05-09  9:45   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-09 15:08     ` Rik van Riel
2014-05-08 17:23 ` [PATCH 2/4] sched,numa: weigh nearby nodes for task placement on complex NUMA topologies riel
2014-05-09  9:53   ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2014-05-09 15:14     ` Rik van Riel
2014-05-09  9:54   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-09 10:03   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-09 15:16     ` Rik van Riel
2014-05-09 10:11   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-09 15:11     ` Rik van Riel
2014-05-09 10:13   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-09 15:03     ` Rik van Riel
2014-05-08 17:23 ` [PATCH 3/4] sched,numa: store numa_group's preferred nid riel
2014-05-08 17:23 ` [PATCH 4/4] sched,numa: pull workloads towards their preferred nodes riel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140509095324.GQ30445@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=chegu_vinod@hp.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox