From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755300AbaELJac (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 May 2014 05:30:32 -0400 Received: from cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com ([217.140.96.50]:61941 "EHLO cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754430AbaELJa2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 May 2014 05:30:28 -0400 Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 10:29:56 +0100 From: Will Deacon To: Larry Bassel Cc: Catalin Marinas , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org" , "khilman@linaro.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: Support arch_irq_work_raise() via self IPIs Message-ID: <20140512092956.GB914@arm.com> References: <1399760621-10954-1-git-send-email-larry.bassel@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1399760621-10954-1-git-send-email-larry.bassel@linaro.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 11:23:41PM +0100, Larry Bassel wrote: > Support for arch_irq_work_raise() was missing from > arm64 (a prerequisite for FULL_NOHZ). [...] > @@ -455,6 +457,14 @@ void arch_send_call_function_single_ipi(int cpu) > smp_cross_call(cpumask_of(cpu), IPI_CALL_FUNC_SINGLE); > } > > +#ifdef CONFIG_IRQ_WORK > +void arch_irq_work_raise(void) > +{ > + if (is_smp()) > + smp_cross_call(cpumask_of(smp_processor_id()), IPI_IRQ_WORK); > +} > +#endif Does this even compile? We're probably better off just checking whether or not smp_cross_call is NULL. Will