public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com>,
	Dario Faggioli <raistlin@linux.it>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-man <linux-man@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: SCHED_DEADLINE, sched_getscheduler(), and sched_getparam()
Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 17:25:36 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140512152536.GR30445@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKgNAkjsEjGM+Znu4iXa7yA-ruDHCDx9SvFow2wn3z2=zAHqCQ@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1913 bytes --]

On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 02:33:42PM +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
> > I'm a proponent of fail hard instead of fail silently and muddle on.
> > And while we can fully and correctly return sched_getscheduler() we
> > cannot do so for sched_getparam().
> >
> > Returning sched_param::sched_priority == 0 for DEADLINE would also break
> > the symmetry between sched_setparam() and sched_getparam(), both will
> > fail for SCHED_DEADLINE.
> 
> Maybe. But there seems to me to be a problem with your logic here.
> (And the symmetry argument seems a weak one to me.)
> 
> I mean, applications that are currently using sched_getscheduler()
> will now get back a new policy (SCHED_DEADLINE) that they may not
> understand, and so they may break.
> 
> On the other hand, applications that call sched_getparam() will fail
> with EINVAL, even though sched_priority has no meaning for
> SCHED_DEADLINE (as for the non-real-time policies), and so it would
> seem to be harmless to succeed and return a sched_priority of 0 in
> this case. It seems to break user-space needlessly, IMHO.
> 
> If anything, I'd have said it would have made more sense to have the
> sched_getscheduler() case fail, while having the sched_getparam() case
> succeed. (But, I can see the argument for having _both_ cases
> succeed.)

Hmm,.. maybe. Can we still change this? Again, maybe, there's not really
that much userspace that relies on this.

In any case, the way I read the little there is on getparam() it seems
to imply the only case where it does make sense to call it at all is
when sched_getscheduler() returns either SCHED_FIFO or SCHED_RR.

And in that sense I suppose the precedent for all other currently
available classes to not fail the param call but return 0 should be
extended.

If only we'd started out with sched_yield()/sched_getparam() etc failing
when not !SCHED_FIFO/RR :-)

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2014-05-12 15:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-05-12 12:09 SCHED_DEADLINE, sched_getscheduler(), and sched_getparam() Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2014-05-12 12:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-12 12:33   ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2014-05-12 15:25     ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2014-05-12 19:42       ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2014-05-12 20:50         ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-19 13:06           ` [tip:sched/core] peter_zijlstra-sched-change_sched_getparam_behaviour_vs_sched_deadline tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-22 12:25           ` [tip:sched/core] sched/deadline: Change sched_getparam() behaviour vs SCHED_DEADLINE tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-05-13  8:14 SCHED_DEADLINE, sched_getscheduler(), and sched_getparam() Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140512152536.GR30445@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=juri.lelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-man@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
    --cc=raistlin@linux.it \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox