From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757349AbaELUmW (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 May 2014 16:42:22 -0400 Received: from mho-03-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.66]:39164 "EHLO mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755120AbaELUmU (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 May 2014 16:42:20 -0400 X-Mail-Handler: Dyn Standard SMTP by Dyn X-Originating-IP: 99.127.230.128 X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse@dyndns.com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/sendlabs/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information) X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX18/xJ2UeWRPADvTVv7/ZooU Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 13:42:13 -0700 From: Tony Lindgren To: Robert Nelson Cc: Matt Ranostay , robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, Russell King , "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" , devicetree , linux kernel , pantelis.antoniou@gmail.com, matt.porter@linaro.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: dts: am335x-bone-common: Add i2c2 definition Message-ID: <20140512204213.GD5668@atomide.com> References: <1399686184-1594-1-git-send-email-mranostay@gmail.com> <20140512195050.GB5668@atomide.com> <20140512201517.GC5668@atomide.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Robert Nelson [140512 13:27]: > >> > > >> > If these pins are not used for i2c2 on some capes, this device > >> > should be set to status = "disabled" state by default. Then > >> > u-boot could re-enable it on the boards that have i2c2 in use. > >> > >> To-date, this is the i2c bus that all capes have placed an at24 eeprom > >> for cape identification. > > > > And how many capes actually implement the eeprom cape identification > > out of the available capes? :) > > Not including one off designs in someone's lab. We will never have an > accurate number. ;) > > So far; just the ones that want their "cape" detected in the default > image currently being shipped by CircuitCo. Otherwise the few that > I've seen without an eeprom, usually follow this default pinmux. > > http://elinux.org/CircuitCo:Basic_Proto_Cape > > Which includes that i2c bus enabled. OK thanks for the info. > Either case if fine with me. As who knows when the dtc "overlay" will > every truly make it mainline, as the capemgr was the only real kernel > user of the i2c/at24 eeprom information. Sounds like we should keep it disabled though so u-boot can be used to toggle it while waiting for the capemgr. That's because the board has a header for pins, so it's not exactly limited to just the capes. Anybody working on enabling/disabling cape dtb configurations in u-boot? Regards, Tony