From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759656AbaEMQMj (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 May 2014 12:12:39 -0400 Received: from e31.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.149]:44924 "EHLO e31.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750948AbaEMQMa (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 May 2014 12:12:30 -0400 Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 09:12:21 -0700 From: "Paul E. McKenney" To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Lai Jiangshan , Thomas Gleixner , LKML , Dave Jones , Linus Torvalds , Darren Hart , Davidlohr Bueso , Ingo Molnar , Steven Rostedt , Clark Williams , Roland McGrath , Carlos ODonell , Jakub Jelinek , Michael Kerrisk , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Subject: Re: [patch 1/3] rtmutex: Add missing deadlock check Message-ID: <20140513161221.GG18164@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reply-To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com References: <20140512190438.314125476@linutronix.de> <20140512201700.999660035@linutronix.de> <5371B2D9.8060405@cn.fujitsu.com> <20140513084815.GB2485@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140513084815.GB2485@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-TM-AS-MML: disable X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 14051316-8236-0000-0000-00000248E8B8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 10:48:15AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 01:51:21PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote: > > I considered you blamed to me. > > I would feel better if you directly blamed to me. > > Well, the way I see it all you're to blame for is 'forgetting' to update > the rt mutex test for 3 years, and while that is unfortunate, the much > bigger fail is merging the patch without it to begin with. > > So in that respect Steven is primarily responsible for merging > incomplete work. > > Now Thomas was entirely grumpy from staring at bugs for a long while, > which is entirely understandable. That said I don't think he went > overboard calling Steven out on this. > > Now, if you and Steve get this sorted, nothing really happened except > that Thomas got grumpy, which is entirely normal, what else would he be? > :-) What Peter said! ;-) Thanx, Paul