From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932849AbaEPPge (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 May 2014 11:36:34 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:22388 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932283AbaEPPgc (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 May 2014 11:36:32 -0400 Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 17:35:30 +0200 From: Oleg Nesterov To: Sasha Levin Cc: Andrew Morton , Frederic Weisbecker , Ingo Molnar , Mathieu Desnoyers , Peter Zijlstra , Steven Rostedt , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] kthreads: kill CLONE_KERNEL, change kernel_thread(kernel_init) to avoid CLONE_SIGHAND Message-ID: <20140516153530.GA30751@redhat.com> References: <20140413195617.GA31819@redhat.com> <53761FDB.10806@oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <53761FDB.10806@oracle.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 05/16, Sasha Levin wrote: > > On 04/13/2014 03:56 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > 1. Remove CLONE_KERNEL, it has no users and it is dangerous. > > > > The (old) comment says "List of flags we want to share for kernel > > threads" but this is not true, we do not want to share ->sighand by > > default. This flag can only be used if the caller is sure that both > > parent/child will never play with signals (say, allow_signal/etc). > > > > 2. Change rest_init() to clone kernel_init() without CLONE_SIGHAND. > > > > In this case CLONE_SIGHAND does not really hurt, and it looks like > > optimization because copy_sighand() can avoid kmem_cache_alloc(). > > > > But in fact this only adds the minor pessimization. kernel_init() > > is going to exec the init process, and de_thread() will need to > > unshare ->sighand and do kmem_cache_alloc(sighand_cachep) anyway, > > but it needs to do more work and take tasklist_lock and siglock. > > > > Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov > > Hi Oleg, > > This patch triggers a hang during boot in my KVM guest. Hmm... How??? ;) > There are no > messages or anything, it just hangs right before init is supposed to > start up. Do you mean kernel_init() hangs somewhere in run_init_process() paths? > I've narrowed it down a bit, and it's the removal of CLONE_SIGHAND > that's bothering it. This must not be possible, I bet there is something else which should be fixed. > Removing CLONE_FS and CLONE_FILES doesn't > cause the hang on boot. kernel_thread(kernel_init) doesn't use CLONE_FILES ? Oleg.