From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
To: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
arm@kernel.org, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>,
boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com, linus.walleij@linaro.org,
Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] at91: cleanup for 3.16 #1
Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 06:22:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140517042216.GI29318@piout.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140516232635.GB6423@quad.lixom.net>
On 16/05/2014 at 16:26:35 -0700, Olof Johansson wrote :
> On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 07:39:35PM +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> > There is a little conflict with at91-3.16-dt that you already pulled in
> > arm-soc: here is the branch that resolves it:
> >
> > https://github.com/at91linux/linux-at91/commits/at91-3.16-resolved
>
> That resolution looks odd. Why is one clock under clocks { } and two of them
> are at the top level? Shouldn't they all be under the clocks subnode?
>
> I've merged in now with your resolution, but I think this needs revisiting.
>
Actually, all the clocks should end up at the root, please refer to:
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-March/240219.html
I feel that was one of the topics we should have discussed at ELC but we
ended up talking about DT ABI stability instead...
--
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-17 4:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-07 17:34 [GIT PULL] at91: cleanup for 3.16 #1 Nicolas Ferre
2014-05-07 17:39 ` Nicolas Ferre
2014-05-16 23:26 ` Olof Johansson
2014-05-16 23:31 ` Olof Johansson
2014-05-19 15:10 ` Nicolas Ferre
2014-05-20 4:28 ` Olof Johansson
2014-05-17 4:22 ` Alexandre Belloni [this message]
2014-05-20 4:25 ` Olof Johansson
2014-05-20 4:32 ` Olof Johansson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140517042216.GI29318@piout.net \
--to=alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=arm@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ludovic.desroches@atmel.com \
--cc=nicolas.ferre@atmel.com \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=plagnioj@jcrosoft.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox