public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Engelmayer <cengelma@gmx.at>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com,
	Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: rtl8188eu: fix usage of uninit scalar in rtw_drv_init()
Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 20:56:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140517205635.22c40685@spike> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140517144423.GA15585@mwanda>

On Sat, 17 May 2014 17:44:23 +0300, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> wrote:
> On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 12:38:57PM +0200, Christian Engelmayer wrote:
> > Function rtw_drv_init() is written in a way that assumes 'status' != _SUCCESS
> > as long as not explicitly set. Thus initialize 'status' to FAIL, in order to
> > prevent undefined behaviour if going through the exit paths. Detected by
> > Coverity - CID 1077832.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Christian Engelmayer <cengelma@gmx.at>
> 
> This is a bugfix and we like to merge bugfixes without asking redo
> things, so don't redo.  But really the better fix is to get rid of the
> status variable completely.  Just return directly on the success path.
> 
> If we were to do that, then both patches would be merged together and
> called:  [patch] Staging: rtl8188eu: fix error handling in rtw_drv_init()
> 
> But this patch is also acceptable as-is.  Thanks for fixing the bug.  :)

I agree with You Dan. I'm no big fan of that status variable either. In this
case I was already tempted, but saw it as a recurring pattern in that file
in case cleanup is done. So I decided to just attack the bug in a small change
and leave the cleanup of the error handling pattern for a later, consistent
sweep over the whole file if that's wanted.

Regards,
Christian

  reply	other threads:[~2014-05-17 18:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-05-17 10:38 [PATCH 0/2] staging: rtl8188eu: fix Coverity defects in rtw_drv_init() Christian Engelmayer
2014-05-17 10:38 ` [PATCH 1/2] staging: rtl8188eu: fix usage of uninit scalar " Christian Engelmayer
2014-05-17 14:44   ` Dan Carpenter
2014-05-17 18:56     ` Christian Engelmayer [this message]
2014-05-17 19:24       ` Dan Carpenter
2014-05-17 10:38 ` [PATCH 2/2] staging: rtl8188eu: remove dead code " Christian Engelmayer
2014-05-17 11:36 ` [PATCH 0/2] staging: rtl8188eu: fix Coverity defects " Jes Sorensen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140517205635.22c40685@spike \
    --to=cengelma@gmx.at \
    --cc=Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com \
    --cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox